• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of root obturated with resilon and gutta-percha using two different techniques: an in vitro study.使用两种不同技术对采用Resilon和牙胶尖进行根管充填的牙根抗折性的比较评估:一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZC15-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11134.5646. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
2
Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Filled with Gutta-Percha and Resilon Obturating Material: An In Vitro Study.根管治疗后用牙胶和Resilon封闭材料充填的牙齿抗折性能评估:一项体外研究。
J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 2):21-5.
3
Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies.牙胶尖和Resilon充填的根管治疗牙根垂直抗折性的比较评价:一项体外研究的Meta分析
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0571-x.
4
Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistance of teeth prepared with rotary system, filled with single cone gutta-percha and laterally condensed with zinc oxide eugenol and resin based (AH26) sealers to that of Resilon.对使用旋转系统制备、填充单锥牙胶并使用氧化锌丁香酚和树脂基(AH26)封闭剂进行侧向加压充填的牙齿与Resilon的抗折性进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Nov 1;13(6):773-81. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1228.
5
Gutta percha verses resilon: an in vitro comparison of fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth.牙胶与热塑性树脂根管充填材料的比较:根管治疗后牙齿抗折性的体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014 Jan-Mar;32(1):53-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.127058.
6
Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistances of endodontically treated teeth filled using five different root canal filling systems.使用五种不同根管充填系统对根管治疗后牙齿的抗折性进行比较评估。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):667-72. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.144375.
7
Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Two Resin-based Sealers to Root Canal Walls: An Study.两种树脂基密封剂与根管壁抗折强度的比较:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):1253-1257.
8
Fracture resistance of teeth obturated with Gutta percha and Resilon: An in vitro study.用牙胶尖和热塑牙胶封闭的牙齿的抗折性:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Apr;13(2):61-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.66712.
9
The comparison of microbial leakage in roots filled with resilon and gutta-percha: An in vitro study.Resilon与牙胶充填根管后微生物渗漏的比较:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2011 Jan;14(1):21-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.80725.
10
In vitro resistance to fracture of roots obturated with Resilon or gutta-percha.根管内用 Resilon 或牙胶尖封闭后的牙根体外抗折能力。
J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):828-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative assessment of vertical fracture resistance in endodontically treated roots with different obturating systems and techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies.不同根管充填系统和技术对根管治疗后牙体垂直抗折能力的比较评估:一项体外研究的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):1439. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05111-x.
2
Effect of root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of in vitro studies.根管封闭剂对根管治疗后牙抗折性能的影响:体外研究的系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Sep;22(7):2475-2485. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2540-9. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Fracture Resistance of Root Canals Obturated with Gutta-Percha versus Resilon with Two Different Techniques.两种不同技术下牙胶尖与Resilon充填根管的抗折性比较
Iran Endod J. 2013 Summer;8(3):136-9. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
2
A comparative study between resilon and gutta-percha as a secondary root canal filling materials: an in vitro study.作为根管二次充填材料的Resilon与牙胶尖的对比研究:一项体外研究。
Iran Endod J. 2010 Summer;5(3):117-20. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
3
Effect of new obturating materials on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.新型充填材料对根管治疗后牙齿垂直根折抗力的影响。
J Endod. 2007 Jun;33(6):732-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
4
Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal.根管内的整体铸造修复体:一个假设的还是切实可行的目标。
J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.009. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
5
Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparation by hand and rotary instrumentation.手工和旋转器械进行根管预备后牙根的断裂强度
J Endod. 2005 Jul;31(7):529-32. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000150947.90682.a0.
6
Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material.用一种新型树脂充填材料进行根管治疗的牙根抗折性
J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 May;135(5):646-52. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0255.
7
Evaluation of apical filling after warm vertical gutta-percha compaction using different procedures.使用不同方法进行热垂直牙胶加压充填后根尖充填情况的评估。
J Endod. 2004 Jun;30(6):436-40. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200406000-00015.
8
A comparison of laterally condensed gutta-percha, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal filling materials.侧向加压热牙胶、热塑牙胶和三氧化矿物凝聚体作为根管充填材料的比较。
J Endod. 2004 Feb;30(2):103-6. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200402000-00010.
9
Patterns of vertical root fracture: factors affecting stress distribution in the root canal.垂直根折模式:影响根管内应力分布的因素
J Endod. 2003 Aug;29(8):523-8. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200308000-00008.
10
The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.使用手动和旋转器械按照基于初始根尖锉尺寸的特定扩大标准进行根尖根管预备的质量。
J Endod. 2002 Sep;28(9):658-64. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200209000-00008.

使用两种不同技术对采用Resilon和牙胶尖进行根管充填的牙根抗折性的比较评估:一项体外研究

Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of root obturated with resilon and gutta-percha using two different techniques: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Shiraguppi Vijayakumar L, B S Hema, G S Chandu, Desai Niranjan, Azad Antriksh

机构信息

Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, M A Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre , Pune, Maharashtra, India .

Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre , Bhopal, Madhyapradesh, India .

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZC15-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11134.5646. Epub 2015 Mar 1.

DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2015/11134.5646
PMID:25954697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4413147/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Present study evaluated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth filled with Gutta percha and a new resin based obturating material (Resilon).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 150 freshly extracted Mandibular premolar with fully formed apices were selected and decoronated at cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). Teeth were divided into Group A and Group B of 75 teeth each. In Group A canals were prepared up to # no 40 K file and Group B up to #no 80 K file. Both the groups were sub divided into five group of 15 teeth each as control group (unfilled canals), lateral condensation with Gutta-percha using AH 26 sealer, vertical condensation with Gutta-percha using AH 26 sealer, lateral condensation with Resilon using resilon sealer, vertical condensation with Resilon using resilon sealer. Each specimen was subjected to compressive load using Universal testing machine. The force required to fracture was recorded and data were analysed by ANOVA, Duncan's test and student T test.

RESULT

The result showed that there is statistically significant difference among experimental groups (p < 0.05). The groups with the Resilon material displayed higher mean fracture loads than the Gutta percha groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between different preparation techniques.

CONCLUSION

Obturating the canals with the new resin-based obturation material increases the in vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth when compared with standard Gutta percha techniques.

摘要

引言

本研究评估了用牙胶和一种新型树脂类根管充填材料(Resilon)充填的根管治疗牙的抗折性能。

材料与方法

共选取150颗新鲜拔除的根尖完全形成的下颌前磨牙,并在牙骨质-釉质界(CEJ)处截冠。将牙齿分为A组和B组,每组75颗。A组根管预备至40号K锉,B组根管预备至80号K锉。两组均再分为五组,每组15颗牙,分别为对照组(未充填根管)、用AH 26封闭剂进行牙胶侧方加压充填、用AH 26封闭剂进行牙胶垂直加压充填、用Resilon封闭剂进行Resilon侧方加压充填、用Resilon封闭剂进行Resilon垂直加压充填。每个标本使用万能试验机施加压缩载荷。记录折断所需的力,并通过方差分析、邓肯检验和学生t检验对数据进行分析。

结果

结果表明,各实验组之间存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.05)。使用Resilon材料的组显示出比牙胶组更高的平均折断载荷。不同预备技术之间未观察到统计学显著差异。

结论

与标准牙胶技术相比,用新型树脂类充填材料充填根管可提高根管治疗牙的体外抗折性能。