DeJong Stephanie A, O'Brien Wayne L, Lu Zhenyu, Cassidy Brianna M, Morgan Stephen L, Myrick Michael L
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, 631 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Appl Spectrosc. 2015 Jun;69(6):733-48. doi: 10.1366/14-07693. Epub 2015 May 1.
Derivatives are common preprocessing tools, typically implemented as Savitzky-Golay (SG) smoothing derivatives. This work discusses the implementation and optimization of fourth-order gap derivatives (GDs) as an alternative to SG derivatives for processing infrared spectra before multivariate calibration. Gap derivatives approximate the analytical derivative by calculating finite differences of spectra without curve fitting. Gap derivatives offer an advantage of tunability for spectral data as the distance (gap) over which this finite difference is calculated can be varied. Gap selection is a compromise between signal attenuation, noise amplification, and spectral resolution. A method and discussion of the importance of fourth derivative gap selections are presented as well as a comparison to SG preprocessing and lower-order GDs in the context of multivariate calibration. In most cases, we found that optimized GDs led to calibration models performing comparably to or better than SG derivatives, and that optimized fourth-order GDs behaved similarly to matched filters.
导数是常见的预处理工具,通常实现为Savitzky-Golay(SG)平滑导数。本文讨论了四阶间隙导数(GD)作为SG导数的替代方法在多元校准前处理红外光谱时的实现与优化。间隙导数通过计算光谱的有限差分来近似解析导数,无需曲线拟合。间隙导数对于光谱数据具有可调性优势,因为计算此有限差分的距离(间隙)可以变化。间隙选择是信号衰减、噪声放大和光谱分辨率之间的一种折衷。本文介绍了一种方法以及关于四阶导数间隙选择重要性的讨论,并在多元校准的背景下将其与SG预处理和低阶GD进行了比较。在大多数情况下,我们发现优化后的GD导致校准模型的性能与SG导数相当或更好,并且优化后的四阶GD的行为类似于匹配滤波器。