Mackie Sarah Louise, Hughes Rodney, Walsh Margaret, Day John, Newton Marion, Pease Colin, Kirwan John, Morris Marianne
Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; NIHR-Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Department of Rheumatology, Ashford and St Peter's NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0126758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126758. eCollection 2015.
To explore patients' concepts of stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and how they think stiffness should be measured.
Eight focus groups were held at three centres involving 50 patients with current/previous PMR. Each group had at least one facilitator and one rapporteur making field notes. An interview schedule was used to stimulate discussion. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive thematic approach.
Major themes identified were: symptoms: pain, stiffness and fatigue; functional impact; impact on daily schedule; and approaches to measurement. The common subtheme for the experience of stiffness was "difficulty in moving", and usually considered as distinct from the experience of pain, albeit with a variable overlap. Some participants felt stiffness was the "overwhelming" symptom, in that it prevented them carrying out "fundamental activities" and "generally living life". Diurnal variation in stiffness was generally described in relation to the daily schedule but was not the same as stiffness severity. Some participants suggested measuring stiffness using a numeric rating scale or a Likert scale, while others felt that it was more relevant and straightforward to measure difficulty in performing everyday activities rather than about stiffness itself.
A conceptual model of stiffness in PMR is presented where stiffness is an important part of the patient experience and impacts on their ability to live their lives. Stiffness is closely related to function and often regarded as interchangeable with pain. From the patients' perspective, visual analogue scales measuring pain and stiffness were not the most useful method for reporting stiffness; participants preferred numerical rating scales, or assessments of function to reflect how stiffness impacts on their daily lives. Assessing function may be a pragmatic solution to difficulties in quantifying stiffness.
探讨风湿性多肌痛(PMR)患者对僵硬的认知,以及他们认为应如何测量僵硬程度。
在三个中心举办了八次焦点小组讨论,共有50名患有当前/既往PMR的患者参与。每个小组至少有一名主持人和一名记录员进行现场记录。使用访谈提纲激发讨论。访谈进行录音、转录,并采用归纳主题分析法进行分析。
确定的主要主题包括:症状:疼痛、僵硬和疲劳;功能影响;对日常安排的影响;以及测量方法。僵硬体验的常见子主题是“活动困难”,通常被认为与疼痛体验不同,尽管存在不同程度的重叠。一些参与者认为僵硬是“压倒性”的症状,因为它使他们无法进行“基本活动”和“正常生活”。僵硬的昼夜变化通常与日常安排相关,但与僵硬严重程度不同。一些参与者建议使用数字评分量表或李克特量表测量僵硬程度,而另一些人则认为测量日常活动困难程度比测量僵硬本身更相关、更直接。
提出了一个PMR僵硬的概念模型,其中僵硬是患者体验的重要组成部分,并影响他们的生活能力。僵硬与功能密切相关,常被视为与疼痛可互换。从患者角度来看,测量疼痛和僵硬的视觉模拟量表并非报告僵硬程度最有用的方法;参与者更喜欢数字评分量表或功能评估来反映僵硬对其日常生活的影响。评估功能可能是解决僵硬量化困难的务实方法。