Muller Sara, Whittle Rebecca, Hider Samantha L, Belcher John, Helliwell Toby, Morton Chris, Hughes Emily, Lawton Sarah A, Mallen Christian D
Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Aug 1;59(8):1906-1915. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez533.
To investigate potential subgroups of primary care-diagnosed patients with PMR based on self-reported pain and stiffness severity over time.
A total of 652 people with an incident PMR diagnosis were recruited from English general practices and completed a baseline postal questionnaire. They were followed up with a further six questionnaires over a 2 year period. A total of 446 people completed the 2 year follow-up. Pain and stiffness were reported on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Latent class growth analysis was used to estimate the joint trajectories of pain and stiffness over time. A combination of statistical and clinical considerations was used to choose the number of clusters. Characteristics of the classes were described.
Five clusters were identified. One cluster represented the profile of 'classical' PMR symptoms and one represented sustained symptoms that may not be PMR. The other three clusters displayed a partial recovery, a recovery followed by worsening and a slow, but sustained recovery. Those displaying classical PMR symptoms were in better overall health at diagnosis than the other groups.
PMR is a heterogeneous condition, with a number of phenotypes. The spectrum of presentation, as well as varying responses to treatment, may be related to underlying health status at diagnosis. Future research should seek to stratify patients at diagnosis to identify those likely to have a poor recovery and in need of an alternative treatment pathway. Clinicians should be aware of the different experiences of patients and monitor symptoms closely, even where there is initial improvement.
根据随时间自我报告的疼痛和僵硬严重程度,调查基层医疗诊断的巨细胞动脉炎(PMR)患者的潜在亚组。
从英国全科医疗中招募了总共652例初发PMR诊断患者,并完成了一份基线邮寄问卷。在2年期间,他们又接受了另外六次问卷调查。共有446人完成了2年随访。疼痛和僵硬程度采用0至10的数字评分量表进行报告。使用潜在类别增长分析来估计疼痛和僵硬随时间的联合轨迹。结合统计和临床因素来选择聚类数量。描述了各聚类的特征。
确定了五个聚类。一个聚类代表“典型”PMR症状特征,一个代表可能不是PMR的持续症状。其他三个聚类分别显示部分恢复、恢复后恶化以及缓慢但持续的恢复。那些表现出典型PMR症状的患者在诊断时的总体健康状况比其他组更好。
PMR是一种异质性疾病,有多种表型。表现谱以及对治疗的不同反应可能与诊断时的基础健康状况有关。未来的研究应寻求在诊断时对患者进行分层,以识别那些可能恢复不佳且需要替代治疗途径的患者。临床医生应意识到患者的不同情况,并密切监测症状,即使在最初有改善的情况下。