• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马杰德贝贝(马拉库南贾二号)的考古学、年代学与地层学:澳大利亚北部一处有早期人类居住的遗址

The archaeology, chronology and stratigraphy of Madjedbebe (Malakunanja II): A site in northern Australia with early occupation.

作者信息

Clarkson Chris, Smith Mike, Marwick Ben, Fullagar Richard, Wallis Lynley A, Faulkner Patrick, Manne Tiina, Hayes Elspeth, Roberts Richard G, Jacobs Zenobia, Carah Xavier, Lowe Kelsey M, Matthews Jacqueline, Florin S Anna

机构信息

School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.

Centre for Historical Research, National Museum of Australia, GPO Box 1901, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2015 Jun;83:46-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 May 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.03.014
PMID:25957653
Abstract

Published ages of >50 ka for occupation at Madjedbebe (Malakunanja II) in Australia's north have kept the site prominent in discussions about the colonisation of Sahul. The site also contains one of the largest stone artefact assemblages in Sahul for this early period. However, the stone artefacts and other important archaeological components of the site have never been described in detail, leading to persistent doubts about its stratigraphic integrity. We report on our analysis of the stone artefacts and faunal and other materials recovered during the 1989 excavations, as well as the stratigraphy and depositional history recorded by the original excavators. We demonstrate that the technology and raw materials of the early assemblage are distinctive from those in the overlying layers. Silcrete and quartzite artefacts are common in the early assemblage, which also includes edge-ground axe fragments and ground haematite. The lower flaked stone assemblage is distinctive, comprising a mix of long convergent flakes, some radial flakes with faceted platforms, and many small thin silcrete flakes that we interpret as thinning flakes. Residue and use-wear analysis indicate occasional grinding of haematite and woodworking, as well as frequent abrading of platform edges on thinning flakes. We conclude that previous claims of extensive displacement of artefacts and post-depositional disturbance may have been overstated. The stone artefacts and stratigraphic details support previous claims for human occupation 50-60 ka and show that human occupation during this time differed from later periods. We discuss the implications of these new data for understanding the first human colonisation of Sahul.

摘要

在澳大利亚北部的马杰德贝贝(马拉库南贾二号)遗址,公布的人类居住年代超过5万年,这使得该遗址在关于萨胡尔殖民化的讨论中一直备受关注。该遗址还拥有萨胡尔这一早期阶段最大的石器组合之一。然而,该遗址的石器及其他重要考古成分从未得到详细描述,这导致人们对其地层完整性一直心存疑虑。我们报告了对1989年发掘期间出土的石器、动物骨骼及其他材料的分析结果,以及原始发掘者记录的地层学和沉积历史。我们证明,早期组合的技术和原材料与上层的不同。硅质岩和石英岩制品在早期组合中很常见,其中还包括边缘打磨的斧头碎片和研磨赤铁矿。下层的片状石器组合很独特,包括长的收敛片状石器、一些带有刻面台面的放射状片状石器,以及许多我们认为是薄化片状石器的小而薄的硅质岩片状石器。残留物和使用磨损分析表明,偶尔会对赤铁矿和木材进行研磨,并且在薄化片状石器上台面边缘经常被磨损。我们得出结论,先前关于文物大量移位和沉积后扰动的说法可能被夸大了。石器和地层细节支持了先前关于5万至6万年前人类居住的说法,并表明这一时期的人类居住情况与后期不同。我们讨论了这些新数据对理解萨胡尔首次人类殖民化的意义。

相似文献

1
The archaeology, chronology and stratigraphy of Madjedbebe (Malakunanja II): A site in northern Australia with early occupation.马杰德贝贝(马拉库南贾二号)的考古学、年代学与地层学:澳大利亚北部一处有早期人类居住的遗址
J Hum Evol. 2015 Jun;83:46-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 May 7.
2
65,000-years of continuous grinding stone use at Madjedbebe, Northern Australia.澳大利亚北部麦迪杰比贝,65000 年来连续使用磨石。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 11;12(1):11747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15174-x.
3
Karnatukul (Serpent's Glen): A new chronology for the oldest site in Australia's Western Desert.卡纳图库尔(蛇谷):澳大利亚西部沙漠最古老遗址的新年代。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0202511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202511. eCollection 2018.
4
Sub-surface movement of stone artefacts at White Paintings Shelter, Tsodilo Hills, Botswana: implications for the Middle Stone Age chronology of central southern Africa.博茨瓦纳措迪洛山白画庇护所石制品的地下移动:对中南非洲中石器时代年代学的影响
J Hum Evol. 2014 Oct;75:153-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
5
Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago.6.5 万年前人类已在澳大利亚北部居住。
Nature. 2017 Jul 19;547(7663):306-310. doi: 10.1038/nature22968.
6
Hominin occupations at the Dmanisi site, Georgia, Southern Caucasus: raw materials and technical behaviours of Europe's first hominins.格鲁吉亚南高加索地区德马尼西遗址的古人类活动:欧洲最早古人类的原材料和技术行为。
J Hum Evol. 2011 May;60(5):571-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.10.008. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
7
Pandanus nutshell generates a palaeoprecipitation record for human occupation at Madjedbebe, northern Australia.斑兰叶的果壳为澳大利亚北部的马杰比比(Madjedbebe)提供了人类居住的古降水记录。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar;5(3):295-303. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01379-8. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
8
The behavioral and cultural stratigraphic contexts of the lithic assemblages from Schöningen.舍宁根石器组合的行为和文化地层背景。
J Hum Evol. 2015 Dec;89:287-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
9
Early human occupation of Australia's eastern seaboard.早期人类在澳大利亚东海岸的居住情况。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):2579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52000-y.
10
The TD6 level lithic industry from Gran Dolina, Atapuerca (Burgos, Spain): production and use.来自西班牙布尔戈斯阿塔普埃尔卡格兰多利纳的TD6阶段石器工业:生产与使用
J Hum Evol. 1999 Sep-Oct;37(3-4):653-93. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0336.

引用本文的文献

1
The landscape of genomic structural variation in Indigenous Australians.澳大利亚原住民的基因组结构变异景观。
Nature. 2023 Dec;624(7992):602-610. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06842-7. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Reconstructing archaeological palaeolandscapes using geophysical and geomatic survey techniques: An example from Red Lily Lagoon, Arnhem Land, Australia.利用地球物理和地理空间测量技术重建考古古景观:以澳大利亚阿纳姆地红百合泻湖为例。
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0283006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283006. eCollection 2023.
3
Species identification of Australian marsupials using collagen fingerprinting.
利用胶原蛋白指纹图谱对澳大利亚有袋类动物进行物种鉴定。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Oct 27;8(10):211229. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211229. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Refining models of archaic admixture in Eurasia with ArchaicSeeker 2.0.利用 ArchaicSeeker 2.0 细化欧亚大陆古人类混合模型。
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 29;12(1):6232. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26503-5.
5
Stochastic models support rapid peopling of Late Pleistocene Sahul.随机模型支持晚更新世萨赫尔的快速殖民化。
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 29;12(1):2440. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21551-3.
6
What the dingo says about dog domestication.犬的驯化问题之野犬说。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2021 Jan;304(1):19-30. doi: 10.1002/ar.24517. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Bows and arrows and complex symbolic displays 48,000 years ago in the South Asian tropics.48000年前在南亚热带地区出现的 bows and arrows 以及复杂的符号展示。 (bows and arrows 直接保留英文,可能是特定的术语或名称未被普遍知晓的事物)
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 12;6(24):eaba3831. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba3831. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Ancient nuclear genomes enable repatriation of Indigenous human remains.古代核基因组使归还原住民遗骸成为可能。
Sci Adv. 2018 Dec 19;4(12):eaau5064. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau5064. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
When did first reach Southeast Asia and Sahul?它(古人类)何时首次到达东南亚和萨胡尔地区?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 21;115(34):8482-8490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808385115. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
10
Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago.6.5 万年前人类已在澳大利亚北部居住。
Nature. 2017 Jul 19;547(7663):306-310. doi: 10.1038/nature22968.