Suppr超能文献

海洋中硝胺类物质的生态毒性,胺基型碳捕获技术的转化产物。

Marine ecotoxicity of nitramines, transformation products of amine-based carbon capture technology.

机构信息

Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo, Norway; Department of Soil Quality and Climate, Bioforsk, Høgskoleveien 7, 1430 Ås, Norway.

Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2015 Sep 15;527-528:211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.119. Epub 2015 May 14.

Abstract

In the context of reducing CO2 emissions to the atmosphere, chemical absorption with amines is emerging as the most advanced technology for post-combustion CO2 capture from exhaust gases of fossil fuel power plants. Despite amine solvent recycling during the capture process, degradation products are formed and released into the environment, among them aliphatic nitramines, for which the environmental impact is unknown. In this study, we determined the acute and chronic toxicity of two nitramines identified as important transformation products of amine-based carbon capture, dimethylnitramine and ethanolnitramine, using a multi-trophic suite of bioassays. The results were then used to produce the first environmental risk assessment for the marine ecosystem. In addition, the in vivo genotoxicity of nitramines was studied by adapting the comet assay to cells from experimentally exposed fish. Overall, based on the whole organism bioassays, the toxicity of both nitramines was considered to be low. The most sensitive response to both compounds was found in oysters, and dimethylnitramine was consistently more toxic than ethanolnitramine in all bioassays. The Predicted No Effect Concentrations for dimethylnitramine and ethanolnitramine were 0.08 and 0.18 mg/L, respectively. The genotoxicity assessment revealed contrasting results to the whole organism bioassays, with ethanolnitramine found to be more genotoxic than dimethylnitramine by three orders of magnitude. At the lowest ethanolnitramine concentration (1mg/L), 84% DNA damage was observed, whereas 100mg/L dimethylnitramine was required to cause 37% DNA damage. The mechanisms of genotoxicity were also shown to differ between the two compounds, with oxidation of the DNA bases responsible for over 90% of the genotoxicity of dimethylnitramine, whereas DNA strand breaks and alkali-labile sites were responsible for over 90% of the genotoxicity of ethanolnitramine. Fish exposed to >3mg/L ethanolnitramine had virtually no DNA left in their red blood cells.

摘要

在减少大气中二氧化碳排放的背景下,化学吸收胺作为最先进的技术,用于从化石燃料发电厂废气中捕集燃烧后二氧化碳。尽管在捕集过程中胺溶剂可以回收,但仍会形成降解产物并释放到环境中,其中包括脂肪族硝胺,其环境影响尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们使用多营养级生物测定套件,确定了两种被确定为基于胺的碳捕集重要转化产物的硝胺的急性和慢性毒性,这两种硝胺是二甲基硝胺和乙醇硝胺。然后,利用这些结果首次对海洋生态系统进行了环境风险评估。此外,我们通过适应彗星试验来研究硝胺的体内遗传毒性,该试验适用于从实验暴露的鱼类中提取的细胞。总体而言,基于整体生物测定,两种硝胺的毒性都被认为是低的。对两种化合物最敏感的反应是在牡蛎中发现的,并且在所有生物测定中,二甲基硝胺的毒性始终比乙醇硝胺高。二甲基硝胺和乙醇硝胺的预测无效应浓度分别为 0.08 和 0.18mg/L。遗传毒性评估结果与整体生物测定结果相反,乙醇硝胺的遗传毒性比二甲基硝胺高三个数量级。在最低的乙醇硝胺浓度(1mg/L)下,观察到 84%的 DNA 损伤,而需要 100mg/L 的二甲基硝胺才能引起 37%的 DNA 损伤。两种化合物的遗传毒性机制也不同,二甲基硝胺的遗传毒性超过 90%是由于 DNA 碱基的氧化,而乙醇硝胺的遗传毒性超过 90%是由于 DNA 链断裂和碱不稳定位点。暴露于>3mg/L 乙醇硝胺的鱼类的红细胞中几乎没有 DNA 残留。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验