Lavender Steven A, Mehta Jay P, Hedman Glenn E, Park Sanghyun, Reichelt Paul A, Conrad Karen M
Integrated Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Orthopedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Integrated Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2015 Sep;50:87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
The physical demands on evacuators were investigated when using different types of sled-type stair descent devices designed for the emergency evacuation of high rise buildings. Twelve firefighters used six sled-type stair descent devices during simulated evacuations. The devices were evaluated under two staircase width conditions (1.12, and 1.32 m). Dependent measures included electromyographic (EMG) data, heart rates, Borg Scale ratings, and descent velocities. All stair descent speeds were below those reported during pedestrian egress trials. With the exception of the inflatable device, the devices operated by two evacuators had higher descent speeds than those operated by a single evacuator. High friction materials under the sleds facilitated control and reduced the muscle demands on stairs but increased physical demands on the landings. Usability assessments found devices with shorter overall lengths had fewer wall contacts on the landing, and handles integrated in the straps were preferred by the evacuators.