• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下经皮乳腺粗针穿刺活检后的影像-组织学不一致性

Imaging-histological discordance after sonographically guided percutaneous breast core biopsy.

作者信息

Soyder Aykut, Taşkin Füsun, Ozbas Serdar

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Aydin, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Aydin, Turkey.

出版信息

Breast Care (Basel). 2015 Feb;10(1):33-7. doi: 10.1159/000370219.

DOI:10.1159/000370219
PMID:25960723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4395822/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency of imaging-histological discordance and to compare the frequency of carcinoma between discordant lesions at ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2009 to June 2012, we performed US-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsies on 989 breast lesions in 961 women. We reviewed 58 (5.8%) cases that had imaging-histological discordance after percutaneous breast biopsy and underwent subsequent excisional biopsy. The clinical, radiological, and histological findings were reviewed for those 58 cases.

RESULTS

Among the 58 cases, subsequent excisions revealed 16 (27.5%) malignancies, which were categorized as 9 (15.5%) invasive ductal carcinomas, 4 (6.9%) malignant phyllodes tumors, and 3 (5.1%) ductal carcinomas in situ.

CONCLUSION

The malignancy rate of 27.5% suggests that surgical excision should be performed in those cases presenting with imaging-histological discordance after US-guided core biopsy. Careful correlation of clinical, radiological, and histological results as well as appropriate follow-up are essential. We have submitted a short version of this work as a poster presentation during the 2012 European Society of Surgery (ESS) Congress in Istanbul/Turkey.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是确定影像学-组织学不一致的频率,并比较超声(US)引导下粗针穿刺活检中不一致病变的癌发生率。

材料与方法

2009年11月至2012年6月,我们对961名女性的989个乳腺病变进行了US引导下的14G粗针穿刺活检。我们回顾了58例(5.8%)经皮乳腺活检后存在影像学-组织学不一致且随后接受切除活检的病例。对这58例病例的临床、放射学和组织学结果进行了回顾。

结果

在这58例病例中,随后的切除显示16例(27.5%)为恶性肿瘤,其中9例(15.5%)为浸润性导管癌,4例(6.9%)为恶性叶状肿瘤,3例(5.1%)为导管原位癌。

结论

27.5%的恶性率表明,对于US引导下粗针活检后出现影像学-组织学不一致的病例应进行手术切除。仔细关联临床、放射学和组织学结果以及适当的随访至关重要。我们已将这项工作的简短版本作为海报展示在2012年于土耳其伊斯坦布尔举行的欧洲外科学会(ESS)大会上。

相似文献

1
Imaging-histological discordance after sonographically guided percutaneous breast core biopsy.超声引导下经皮乳腺粗针穿刺活检后的影像-组织学不一致性
Breast Care (Basel). 2015 Feb;10(1):33-7. doi: 10.1159/000370219.
2
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted removal versus surgery for breast lesions showing imaging-histology discordance after ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy.经皮超声引导下真空辅助切除与手术治疗超声引导下空心针活检后影像学-组织学不相符的乳腺病变。
Korean J Radiol. 2014 Nov-Dec;15(6):697-703. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.697. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
3
Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during US-guided 14G automated core biopsy: can the directional vacuum-assisted removal replace the surgical excision? Initial findings.超声引导下14G自动芯针活检过程中影像与组织学结果不一致的乳腺病变:定向真空辅助切除能否取代手术切除?初步研究结果。
Eur Radiol. 2007 Sep;17(9):2376-83. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0603-4. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
4
Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions.超声引导下14G Core Needle活检的准确性:715例连续乳腺活检结果及对良性病变至少两年的随访
J Clin Ultrasound. 2005 Feb;33(2):47-52. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20089.
5
Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods.超声引导下乳腺粗针活检:14号自动活检枪与11号定向真空辅助活检方法的比较
Korean J Radiol. 2005 Apr-Jun;6(2):102-9. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2005.6.2.102.
6
Sonographically-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy for papillary lesions of the breast.超声引导下14号粗针穿刺活检用于乳腺乳头状病变
Korean J Radiol. 2007 May-Jun;8(3):206-11. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.3.206.
7
MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.磁共振成像引导下9号真空辅助芯针乳腺活检:初步经验
Radiology. 2006 Jan;238(1):54-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2381050050. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
8
Imaging-histologic discordance at sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions.超声引导下经皮穿刺乳腺病变活检的影像学与组织学不一致性
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Jan;65(1):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
9
Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.超声及超声引导下粗针活检在乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)诊断评估中的作用。
Radiol Med. 2007 Sep;112(6):863-76. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0183-z. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
10
Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of papillary lesions of the breast.乳腺乳头状病变的影像引导下粗针穿刺活检
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Nov;179(5):1185-92. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791185.

引用本文的文献

1
Upfront Definitive Oncoplastic Breast Conservation Surgery in Biopsy Missed Cancers: Our Experience.活检遗漏癌症的 upfront 确定性肿瘤整形保乳手术:我们的经验。
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):150-158. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02060-3. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
[Interpretation of Image-Guided Biopsy Results and Assessment].[影像引导下活检结果的解读与评估]
J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023 Mar;84(2):361-371. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0164. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
3
Positive Predictive Value for the Malignancy of Mammographic Abnormalities Based on the Presence of an Ultrasound Correlate.基于超声相关性的乳腺钼靶异常恶性病变的阳性预测值
Ultrasound Int Open. 2022 Jul 15;8(1):E8-E14. doi: 10.1055/a-1832-1808. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Discrepancies between radiological and histological findings in preoperative core needle (CNB) and vacuum-assisted (VAB) breast biopsies.术前空心针(CNB)和真空辅助(VAB)乳腺活检的影像学和组织学检查结果差异。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar;147(3):749-754. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03481-7. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
5
Evaluating imaging-pathology concordance and discordance after ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.评估超声引导下乳腺活检后的影像-病理一致性和不一致性。
Ultrasonography. 2018 Apr;37(2):107-120. doi: 10.14366/usg.17049. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
6
Ultrasonography-guided 14-gauge core biopsy of the breast: results of 7 years of experience.超声引导下14G乳腺粗针穿刺活检:7年经验总结
Ultrasonography. 2018 Jan;37(1):55-62. doi: 10.14366/usg.17028. Epub 2017 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Mimickers of breast malignancy on breast sonography.乳腺恶性肿瘤的超声声像图表现。
J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Nov;32(11):2029-36. doi: 10.7863/ultra.32.11.2029.
2
US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases.超声引导下14号乳腺粗针穿刺活检:1352例验证性研究结果
Radiology. 2008 Aug;248(2):406-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482071994.
3
Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them.超声引导下粗针穿刺活检漏诊的乳腺癌:如何减少漏诊
Radiographics. 2007 Jan-Feb;27(1):79-94. doi: 10.1148/rg.271065029.
4
Image-guided tissue sampling: where radiology meets pathology.图像引导下的组织采样:放射学与病理学的交汇点。
Breast J. 2005 Nov-Dec;11(6):403-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.00130.x.
5
Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy.经皮影像引导下乳腺粗针穿刺活检。
Radiol Clin North Am. 2002 May;40(3):483-500, vi. doi: 10.1016/s0033-8389(01)00011-2.
6
Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy.经皮乳腺活检的影像学-组织学不一致性
Cancer. 2000 Dec 15;89(12):2538-46. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001215)89:12<2538::aid-cncr4>3.0.co;2-#.
7
Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy.经皮乳腺粗针活检的临床管理问题
Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;38(4):791-807. doi: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70201-3.
8
Predictive value of specimen radiography for core needle biopsy of noncalcified breast masses.标本放射成像对非钙化乳腺肿块粗针活检的预测价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Dec;171(6):1671-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.6.9843311.
9
US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness.超声引导下乳腺粗针活检:应用与成本效益
Radiology. 1998 Sep;208(3):717-23. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.3.9722851.
10
Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy.粗针穿刺活检:对非恶性乳腺异常情况采用手术切除或重复粗针穿刺活检进行评估。
Radiology. 1998 Mar;206(3):717-20. doi: 10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494490.