Johnston Simon J, Cheung Kwok-Leung
School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, DE22 3DT, UK.
Future Oncol. 2015;11(10):1555-65. doi: 10.2217/fon.15.13.
A Cochrane review of randomized trials shows no difference in overall survival between surgery and primary endocrine therapy (PET) in older women with operable primary breast cancer. Most of these trials were small and unselected for estrogen receptor (ER) status. Evidence exists showing a significant correlation between the degree of ER-positivity and response and outcome in patients receiving PET. Although surgery remains the treatment of choice, patients with ER-rich tumors tend to do equally well on PET. When deciding optimal therapies, co-morbidities and frailty (which impact on the likelihood of death due to competing causes), patient choice, agent of choice (notably the third-generation aromatase inhibitors) and biology (more than just being ER-positive) should all be taken into account.
一项对随机试验的Cochrane综述表明,对于患有可手术原发性乳腺癌的老年女性,手术和原发性内分泌治疗(PET)在总生存率上没有差异。这些试验大多规模较小,且未根据雌激素受体(ER)状态进行筛选。有证据表明,接受PET治疗的患者中,ER阳性程度与反应及预后之间存在显著相关性。尽管手术仍然是首选治疗方法,但ER丰富肿瘤的患者在PET治疗上往往也有同样好的效果。在决定最佳治疗方案时,应综合考虑合并症和虚弱状况(这会影响因其他竞争原因导致死亡的可能性)、患者选择、所选药物(特别是第三代芳香化酶抑制剂)以及生物学因素(不仅仅是ER阳性)。