Translating PEARLS: Lessons Learned from Providers and Participants.
作者信息
Snowden Mark B, Steinman Lesley E, Piering Pamela, Rigor Sluggo, Yip Andrea
机构信息
University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center , Seattle, WA , USA.
Healthy Aging Consultant , Seattle, WA , USA.
出版信息
Front Public Health. 2015 Apr 27;2:256. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00256. eCollection 2014.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Translating PEARLS: Lessons Learned from Providers and Participants.解读PEARLS：从提供者和参与者身上学到的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2015 Apr 27;2:256. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00256. eCollection 2014.
2
Translating evidence-based interventions from research to practice: challenges and lessons learned.将基于证据的干预措施从研究转化为实践：挑战与经验教训。
Transl Behav Med. 2015 Jun;5(2):233-41. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0307-2.
3
Development and Evaluation of a Fidelity Instrument for PEARLS.PEARLS 信度工具的开发与评估。
Front Public Health. 2015 Apr 27;2:200. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00200. eCollection 2014.
4
Using the RE-AIM framework to translate a research-based falls prevention intervention into a community-based program: lessons learned.利用 RE-AIM 框架将基于研究的防跌倒干预措施转化为基于社区的项目：经验教训。
J Safety Res. 2011 Dec;42(6):509-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
5
Can lessons learned from a Cuban experience improve health disparities in south Los Angeles?从古巴经验中汲取的教训能否改善洛杉矶南部的健康差距？
Ethn Dis. 2008 Spring;18(2 Suppl 2):S2-141-5.
6
Using American sign language interpreters to facilitate research among deaf adults: lessons learned.使用美国手语译员帮助聋人成年人进行研究：经验教训。
J Transcult Nurs. 2011 Apr;22(2):129-34. doi: 10.1177/1043659610395765. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
7
Implementation Science: Lessons Learned From Evaluating Practice Recommendations for the Care of Patients With Spine Injuries.实施科学：从评估脊柱损伤患者护理实践建议中吸取的教训。
J Athl Train. 2019 Feb;54(2):192-197. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-242-17.
8
Defining a risk-informed framework for whole-of-government lessons learned: A Canadian perspective.为政府整体经验教训定义一个基于风险的框架：加拿大视角。
J Emerg Manag. 2017 Jul/Aug;15(4):219-231. doi: 10.5055/jem.2017.0331.
9
From Efficacy to Global Impact: Lessons Learned About What Not to Do in Translating Our Research to Reach.从疗效到全球影响：在将我们的研究转化为实际成果过程中关于“不该做什么”的经验教训
Behav Ther. 2017 Sep;48(5):718-730. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
RE-AIM in the Real World: Use of the RE-AIM Framework for Program Planning and Evaluation in Clinical and Community Settings.现实世界中的RE-AIM：将RE-AIM框架用于临床和社区环境中的项目规划与评估
Front Public Health. 2019 Nov 22;7:345. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00345. eCollection 2019.
引用本文的文献
1
Effectiveness of the Program to Encourage Active, Rewarding Lives (PEARLS) to reduce depression: a multi-state evaluation.鼓励积极、有回报的生活计划（PEARLS）对减少抑郁的有效性：一项多州评估。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 9;11:1169257. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1169257. eCollection 2023.
2
Partnering with community-based organizations to improve equitable access to depression care for underserved older adults in the U.S.: Qualitative formative research.与社区组织合作，改善美国服务不足的老年人群体获得抑郁症护理的公平机会：定性形成性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;10:1079082. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1079082. eCollection 2022.
3
Self-management in epilepsy: Why and how you should incorporate self-management in your practice.癫痫的自我管理：为何以及如何在你的实践中纳入自我管理。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Mar;68:220-224. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.015. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
4
Research, practice, and policy perspectives on evidence-based programing for older adults.针对老年人循证方案制定的研究、实践及政策视角
Front Public Health. 2015 Apr 27;3:136. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00136. eCollection 2015.
本文引用的文献
1
Development and Evaluation of a Fidelity Instrument for PEARLS.PEARLS 信度工具的开发与评估。
Front Public Health. 2015 Apr 27;2:200. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00200. eCollection 2014.
2
Community treatment of older adults: principles and evidence supporting mental health service interventions.老年人的社区治疗：支持心理健康服务干预措施的原则与证据
Clin Geriatr Med. 2014 Aug;30(3):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
3
It Could Be a Pearl to You: Exploring Recruitment and Retention of the Program to Encourage Active, Rewarding Lives (PEARLS) With Hard-to-Reach Populations.对你来说它可能是颗珍珠：探索针对难以接触到的人群开展的鼓励积极、有益生活计划（PEARLS）的招募与留存情况。
Gerontologist. 2015 Aug;55(4):667-76. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt137. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
4
Implementation of an evidence-based depression care management program (PEARLS): perspectives from staff and former clients.实施基于证据的抑郁关怀管理项目（PEARLS）：员工和前客户的观点。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E91. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
5
Long-term outcomes from the PEARLS randomized trial for the treatment of depression in patients with epilepsy.癫痫患者抑郁治疗的 PEARLS 随机试验的长期结果。
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Mar;20(3):545-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.01.017. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
6
PEARLS depression treatment for individuals with epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial.PEARLS 抑郁治疗方案对癫痫患者的影响：一项随机对照试验。
Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Nov;19(3):225-31. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
7
Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology.评估研究的相关性、普遍性和适用性：外部验证与转化方法中的问题。
Eval Health Prof. 2006 Mar;29(1):126-53. doi: 10.1177/0163278705284445.
8
Beginning with the application in mind: designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination.从应用出发：设计和规划健康行为改变干预措施以促进传播。
Ann Behav Med. 2005 Apr;29 Suppl:66-75. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_10.
9
Community-integrated home-based depression treatment in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.老年人社区综合居家抑郁症治疗：一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 7;291(13):1569-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.13.1569.
10
The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener.患者健康问卷-2：一项两项抑郁症筛查工具的效度
Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C.
Zotero 插件