Christoph Marian, Herold Joerg, Berg-Holldack Anna, Rauwolf Thomas, Ziemssen Tjalf, Schmeisser Alexander, Weinert Sönke, Ebner Bernd, Ibrahim Karim, Strasser Ruth H, Braun-Dullaeus Ruediger C
Heart Center, University Hospital, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Cardiology. 2015;131(3):165-71. doi: 10.1159/000376570. Epub 2015 May 6.
Despite the advanced therapy with statins, antithrombotics, and antihypertensive agents, the medical treatment of atherosclerotic disease is less than optimal. Therefore, additional therapeutic antiatherosclerotic options are desirable. This pilot study was performed to assess the potential antiatherogenic effect of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist pioglitazone in nondiabetic patients.
A total of 54 nondiabetic patients were observed in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to pioglitazone or placebo. The following efficacy parameters were determined by serial analyses: artery pulse wave analysis and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), static and dynamic retinal vessel function, and the common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT). The main secondary endpoint was the change in different biochemical markers.
After 9 months, no relevant differences could be determined in the two treatment groups in PWV (pioglitazone 14.3 ± 4.4 m/s vs. placebo 14.2 ± 4.2 m/s), retinal arterial diameter (pioglitazone 112.1 ± 23.3 µm vs. placebo 117.9 ± 21.5 µm) or IMT (pioglitazone 0.85 ± 0.30 mm vs. placebo 0.79 ± 0.15 mm). Additionally, there were no differences in the change in biochemical markers like cholesteryl ester transfer protein, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or white blood cell count.
Treatment with a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist in nondiabetic patients did not improve the function of large and small peripheral vessels (PPP Trial, clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2006-000186-11).
尽管使用他汀类药物、抗血栓药物和抗高血压药物进行了先进的治疗,但动脉粥样硬化疾病的医学治疗仍不尽人意。因此,需要更多的治疗性抗动脉粥样硬化选择。本前瞻性研究旨在评估过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ激动剂吡格列酮在非糖尿病患者中的潜在抗动脉粥样硬化作用。
在一项前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中观察了54例非糖尿病患者。患者被随机分为吡格列酮组或安慰剂组。通过系列分析确定以下疗效参数:动脉脉搏波分析和颈股脉搏波速度(PWV)、静态和动态视网膜血管功能以及颈总动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)。主要次要终点是不同生化标志物的变化。
9个月后,两组在PWV(吡格列酮组14.3±4.4米/秒,安慰剂组14.2±4.2米/秒)、视网膜动脉直径(吡格列酮组112.1±23.3微米,安慰剂组117.9±21.5微米)或IMT(吡格列酮组0.85±0.30毫米,安慰剂组0.79±0.15毫米)方面未发现相关差异。此外,在胆固醇酯转运蛋白、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高敏C反应蛋白或白细胞计数等生化标志物的变化方面也没有差异。
在非糖尿病患者中使用过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ激动剂治疗并不能改善外周大、小血管的功能(PPP试验,clinicaltrialsregister.eu:2006-000186-11)。