Arntzen Erik, Nartey Richard K, Fields Lanny
Oslo and Akershus University College.
Queens College and The Graduate School of the City University of New York.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 May;103(3):524-41. doi: 10.1002/jeab.152.
Undergraduates in six groups of 10 attempted to form three 3-node 5-member equivalence classes (A → B → C → D → E) under the simultaneous protocol. In five of six groups, all stimuli were abstract shapes; in the PIC group, C stimuli were pictures with the remainder being abstract shapes. Before class formation, participants in the Identity-S and Identity-D groups were given preliminary training to form identity conditional discriminations with the C stimuli using simultaneous and 6 s delayed matching-to-sample procedures, respectively. In the Arbitrary-S and Arbitrary-D groups, before class formation, arbitrary conditional discriminations were formed between C and X stimuli using simultaneous and 6 s delayed matching-to-sample procedures, respectively. With no preliminary training, classes in the PIC and ABS groups were formed by 80% and 0% of participants, respectively. After preliminary training, class formation (yield) increased with delay, regardless of relational type. For each of the two delays, yield was slightly greater after forming arbitrary- instead of identity-relations. Yield was greatest, however, when a class contained a meaningful stimulus (PIC). During failed class formation, probes produced experimenter-defined relations, participant-defined relations, and unsystematic responding; delay, but not the relation type in preliminary training influenced relational and indeterminate responding. These results suggest how meaningful stimuli enhance equivalence class formation.
六组每组10名本科生尝试在同步协议下形成三个由5名成员组成的3节点等价类(A→B→C→D→E)。在六组中的五组中,所有刺激都是抽象形状;在图片组(PIC组)中,C刺激是图片,其余是抽象形状。在形成类别之前,身份 - S组和身份 - D组的参与者分别接受了初步训练,使用同步和6秒延迟样本匹配程序对C刺激形成身份条件辨别。在任意 - S组和任意 - D组中,在形成类别之前,分别使用同步和6秒延迟样本匹配程序在C和X刺激之间形成任意条件辨别。未经初步训练时,图片组(PIC组)和抽象形状组(ABS组)中分别有80%和0%的参与者形成了类别。经过初步训练后,无论关系类型如何,类别形成(成功率)都随延迟增加。对于两种延迟中的每一种,形成任意关系后成功率略高于形成身份关系后。然而,当一个类别包含有意义的刺激(图片组(PIC组))时,成功率最高。在类别形成失败期间,探测产生了实验者定义的关系、参与者定义的关系和无系统的反应;延迟而非初步训练中的关系类型影响了关系性和不确定性反应。这些结果表明了有意义的刺激如何增强等价类的形成。