• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对单语西班牙语使用者的b测试、点数测试、雷-15项加识别测试和雷单词识别测试的特异性数据。

Specificity data for the b Test, Dot Counting Test, Rey-15 Item Plus Recognition, and Rey Word Recognition Test in monolingual Spanish-speakers.

作者信息

Robles Luz, López Enrique, Salazar Xavier, Boone Kyle B, Glaser Debra F

机构信息

a California School Forensic Studies , Alliant International University , Los Angeles , CA , USA.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(6):614-21. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1039961. Epub 2015 May 13.

DOI:10.1080/13803395.2015.1039961
PMID:25969922
Abstract

The current study provides specificity data on a large sample (n = 115) of young to middle-aged, male, monolingual Spanish speakers of lower educational level and low acculturation to mainstream US culture for four neurocognitive performance validity tests (PVTs): the Dot Counting, the b Test, Rey Word Recognition, and Rey 15-Item Plus Recognition. Individuals with 0 to 6 years of education performed more poorly than did participants with 7 to 10 years of education on several Rey 15-Item scores (combination equation, recall intrusion errors, and recognition false positives), Rey Word Recognition total correct, and E-score and omission errors on the b Test, but no effect of educational level was observed for Dot Counting Test scores. Cutoff scores are provided that maintain approximately 90% specificity for the education subgroups separately. Some of these cutoffs match, or are even more stringent than, those recommended for use in US test takers who are primarily Caucasian, are tested in English, and have a higher educational level (i.e., Rey Word Recognition correct false-positive errors; Rey 15-Item recall intrusions and recognition false-positive errors; b Test total time; and Dot Counting E-score and grouped dot counting time). Thus, performance on these PVT variables in particular appears relatively robust to cultural/language/educational factors.

摘要

本研究提供了关于一个大样本(n = 115)的年轻至中年、男性、教育水平较低且对美国主流文化适应程度较低的单语西班牙语使用者在四项神经认知能力效标测试(PVT)上的特异性数据,这四项测试分别为:点数测试、b测试、雷伊单词识别测试以及雷伊15项加识别测试。在雷伊15项测试的几个得分(组合方程、回忆侵入错误和识别假阳性)、雷伊单词识别测试的总正确数、b测试的E分数和遗漏错误方面,接受0至6年教育的个体比接受7至10年教育的参与者表现更差,但在点数测试分数方面未观察到教育水平的影响。分别为各教育亚组提供了保持约90%特异性的临界分数。其中一些临界分数与为主要是白人、用英语进行测试且教育水平较高的美国应试者推荐使用的临界分数相匹配,甚至更为严格(即雷伊单词识别测试的正确假阳性错误;雷伊15项测试的回忆侵入和识别假阳性错误;b测试的总时间;以及点数测试的E分数和分组点数时间)。因此,特别是这些PVT变量上的表现似乎对文化/语言/教育因素具有相对较强的抗性。

相似文献

1
Specificity data for the b Test, Dot Counting Test, Rey-15 Item Plus Recognition, and Rey Word Recognition Test in monolingual Spanish-speakers.针对单语西班牙语使用者的b测试、点数测试、雷-15项加识别测试和雷单词识别测试的特异性数据。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(6):614-21. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1039961. Epub 2015 May 13.
2
Wait, There's a Baby in this Bath Water! Update on Quantitative and Qualitative Cut-Offs for Rey 15-Item Recall and Recognition.等等!洗澡水里还有个婴儿!关于 Rey 15 项回忆和识别测试的定量和定性截断值的更新。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Nov 27;34(8):1367-1380. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy087.
3
Relationships between eight measures of suspect effort.八种可疑努力程度衡量指标之间的关系。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 May;17(2):263-72. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.2.263.16511.
4
The Rey 15-item memory test and Spanish-speaking older adults.雷氏 15 项记忆测验与西班牙语裔老年人群。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;25(7):1253-65. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.609839. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
5
Dementia and effort test performance.痴呆与努力测试表现。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Jan;23(1):133-52. doi: 10.1080/13854040701819050. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
6
Specificity rates for non-clinical, bilingual, Mexican Americans on three popular performance validity measures.针对非临床、双语的墨西哥裔美国人在三种常用的表现效度测量方法上的特异率。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Apr;31(3):587-597. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1277786. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
7
Re-examination of the Rey Word Recognition Test.再探瑞文文字推理测验。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(3):516-27. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.744853. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
8
The utility of the Rey Word Recognition Test in the detection of suspect effort.雷氏词语识别测验在检测可疑努力程度方面的效用。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Dec;20(4):873-87. doi: 10.1080/13854040590967603.
9
Specificity rates for non-clinical, bilingual, Mexican Americans with California Verbal Learning Test3, verbal fluency, and Rey 15-IR performance validity measures.非临床、双语、墨西哥裔美国人的加利福尼亚语言学习测验 3、词语流畅性和 Rey 15-IR 表现效度测试的特异性率。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Nov;33(8):1445-1454. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1530374. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
10
The use of performance validity tests among inpatient forensic monolingual Spanish-speakers.在只会说西班牙语的住院法医患者中使用效标效度测试。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(6):671-679. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1970555. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Measures of performance validity for Hispanic/Latin American adults: A PRISMA systematic review.西班牙裔/拉丁裔成年人的表现效度测量:一项PRISMA系统评价。
Psychol Neurosci. 2024 Mar;17(1):40-60. doi: 10.1037/pne0000330. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
2
Validity assessment in Eastern Europe: cross-validation of the Dot Counting Test and MODEMM against the TOMM-1 and Rey-15 in a Romanian mixed clinical sample.东欧的效度评估:在罗马尼亚混合临床样本中,对点数测试和MODEMM与TOMM - 1及雷 - 15进行交叉验证。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Apr 27;40(3):614-625. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acad085.
3
Performance Validity Test Failure in the Clinical Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Rates.
临床人群中的效标效度测试失败:患病率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Mar;34(1):299-319. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09582-7. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
4
Investigating the psychometric properties of the Suicide Stroop Task.调查自杀 Stroop 任务的心理计量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Aug;31(8):1052-1061. doi: 10.1037/pas0000723. Epub 2019 May 9.