Matsuo Koji, Fullerton Morgan E, Moeini Aida
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles County Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD520, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):29-38. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2731-8. Epub 2015 May 14.
Cervical cancer complicated by complete uterine prolapse is a rare clinical entity and uniform management recommendations have yet to be determined. The aim of the current review was to examine the effects of management patterns on survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients with complete uterine prolapse.
A systematic review of the literature was conducted using three public search engines. This included case reports with detailed descriptions of tumor characteristics, cancer management, and survival outcomes. Treatment patterns and tumor characteristics were correlated to survival outcomes.
There were 78 patients with cervical cancer with complete uterine prolapse. Their mean age was 63.7 years. The median duration of prolapse was 147.9 months and 22.2% of the patients experienced persistent/recurrent prolapse after cancer treatment. The mean tumor size was 8.9 cm and squamous cell carcinoma (83.9%) was the most common histologic type. The majority of patients (56.2%) had stage I cancer. Tumor characteristics were similar across the treatment patterns. Survival outcomes were more favorable with surgery-based treatment (48 patients) than with radiation-based treatment (30 patients): 5-year recurrence-free survival rate 72.0% vs. 62.9% (p = 0.057), and 5-year disease-specific overall survival rate 77.0% vs. 68.2% (p = 0.017). After controlling for age and stage, surgery-based therapy remained an independent prognostic factor for better disease-specific overall survival outcome (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.11 - 0.94, adjusted p = 0.039).
Although limited in study size, our results at least suggest that surgery-based treatment may have a positive effect on survival outcome in cervical cancer patients with complete uterine prolapse.
宫颈癌合并完全性子宫脱垂是一种罕见的临床情况,尚未确定统一的管理建议。本综述的目的是研究管理模式对完全性子宫脱垂宫颈癌患者生存结局的影响。
使用三个公共搜索引擎对文献进行系统综述。这包括对肿瘤特征、癌症管理和生存结局有详细描述的病例报告。将治疗模式和肿瘤特征与生存结局相关联。
有78例宫颈癌合并完全性子宫脱垂患者。她们的平均年龄为63.7岁。脱垂的中位持续时间为147.9个月,22.2%的患者在癌症治疗后出现持续性/复发性脱垂。平均肿瘤大小为8.9 cm,鳞状细胞癌(83.9%)是最常见的组织学类型。大多数患者(56.2%)为I期癌症。不同治疗模式下的肿瘤特征相似。基于手术的治疗(48例患者)的生存结局比基于放疗的治疗(30例患者)更有利:5年无复发生存率分别为72.0%和62.9%(p = 0.057),5年疾病特异性总生存率分别为77.0%和68.2%(p = 0.017)。在控制年龄和分期后,基于手术的治疗仍然是疾病特异性总生存结局更好的独立预后因素(风险比0.32,95%置信区间0.11 - 0.94,校正p = 0.039)。
尽管研究规模有限,但我们的结果至少表明,基于手术的治疗可能对完全性子宫脱垂宫颈癌患者的生存结局有积极影响。