Nakanishi Rine, Gransar Heidi, Slomka Piotr, Arsanjani Reza, Shalev Aryeh, Otaki Yuka, Friedman John D, Hayes Sean W, Thomson Louise E B, Fish Mathews, Germano Guido, Abidov Aiden, Shaw Leslee, Rozanski Alan, Berman Daniel S
Departments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Oregon Heart and Vascular Institute, Sacred Heart Medical Center, Springfield, OR, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):530-41. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0150-3. Epub 2015 May 14.
While uncommon, normal stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be seen in patients with high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) by invasive coronary angiography (ICA).The predictors of high-risk CAD in patients with normal SPECT-MPI have not been described.
We studied 580 patients (age 64 ± 12 years, 49% men) without known CAD who underwent stress-gated SPECT-MPI [exercise (41%) or vasodilator (59%)] <2 months before ICA and had summed stress score (SSS) <4. High-risk CAD was defined as 3 vessels with ≥70% stenosis, 2 vessels with ≥70% stenosis including proximal left anterior descending, or left main with ≥50% stenosis. Obstructive non-high-risk CAD was defined by the presence of a ≥70% stenosis but without having other high-risk criteria. Tenfold cross-validated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) estimates were obtained to assess the predictors of high-risk CAD.
Forty-two subjects (7.2%) had high-risk CAD and 168 (29.0%) had obstructive non-high-risk CAD. Variables associated with high-risk CAD were pretest probability of CAD ≥66% (Odds ratio [OR] 3.63, 95% CI 1.6-8.3, P = .002), SSS > 0 (OR 7.46, 95% CI 2.6-21.1, P < 0.001), and abnormal TID (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.0-4.5, P = 0.044). When substituted for TID, EF change was also predictive of high-risk CAD (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.9-1.0, P = 0.023). The prevalence of high-risk CAD increased as the number of these predictors increased. In a sub-analysis of patients in whom quantitative total perfusion deficit (TPD) was available, TPD > 0 was also a predictor of high-risk CAD (OR 6.01, 95% CI 1.5-22.2, P = 0.011).
Several clinical, stress, and SPECT-MPI findings are associated high-risk CAD among patients with normal SPECT-MPI. Consideration of these factors may improve the overall assessment of the likelihood of high-risk CAD in patients undergoing stress SPECT-MPI.
虽然不常见,但通过有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)可发现,高危冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中可出现正常应力单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像(MPI)。尚未描述SPECT-MPI正常的患者中高危CAD的预测因素。
我们研究了580例无已知CAD的患者(年龄64±12岁,49%为男性),这些患者在ICA前<2个月接受了门控应力SPECT-MPI检查[运动(41%)或血管扩张剂(59%)],且应力总分(SSS)<4。高危CAD定义为3支血管狭窄≥70%、2支血管狭窄≥70%包括左前降支近端或左主干狭窄≥50%。阻塞性非高危CAD定义为存在≥70%的狭窄但无其他高危标准。通过十折交叉验证的受试者工作特征(ROC)估计来评估高危CAD的预测因素。
42例受试者(7.2%)患有高危CAD,168例(29.0%)患有阻塞性非高危CAD。与高危CAD相关的变量有CAD的预测试概率≥66%(优势比[OR]3.63,95%可信区间1.6-8.3,P = 0.002)、SSS>0(OR 7.46,95%可信区间2.6-21.1,P<0.001)和异常TID(OR 2.16,95%可信区间1.0-4.5,P = 0.044)。当用EF变化替代TID时,EF变化也可预测高危CAD(OR 0.93,95%可信区间0.9-1.0,P = 0.023)。随着这些预测因素数量的增加,高危CAD的患病率也增加。在对可获得定量总灌注缺损(TPD)的患者进行的亚分析中,TPD>0也是高危CAD的一个预测因素(OR 6.01,95%可信区间1.5-22.2,P = 0.011)。
在SPECT-MPI正常的患者中,一些临床、应力和SPECT-MPI检查结果与高危CAD相关。考虑这些因素可能会改善对接受应力SPECT-MPI检查患者中高危CAD可能性的整体评估。