Hernan Andrea L, Giles Sally J, Fuller Jeffrey, Johnson Julie K, Walker Christine, Dunbar James A
Greater Green Triangle University Department of Rural Health, Flinders and Deakin University, Warrnambool, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.
NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):583-93. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004049. Epub 2015 May 13.
Patients can have an important role in reducing harm in primary-care settings. Learning from patient experience and feedback could improve patient safety. Evidence that captures patients' views of the various contributory factors to creating safe primary care is largely absent. The aim of this study was to address this evidence gap.
Four focus groups and eight semistructured interviews were conducted with 34 patients and carers from south-east Australia. Participants were asked to describe their experiences of primary care. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and specific factors that contribute to safety incidents were identified in the analysis using the Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework (YCFF). Other factors emerging from the data were also ascertained and added to the analytical framework.
Thirteen factors that contribute to safety incidents in primary care were ascertained. Five unique factors for the primary-care setting were discovered in conjunction with eight factors present in the YCFF from hospital settings. The five unique primary care contributing factors to safety incidents represented a range of levels within the primary-care system from local working conditions to the upstream organisational level and the external policy context. The 13 factors included communication, access, patient factors, external policy context, dignity and respect, primary-secondary interface, continuity of care, task performance, task characteristics, time in the consultation, safety culture, team factors and the physical environment.
Patient and carer feedback of this type could help primary-care professionals better understand and identify potential safety concerns and make appropriate service improvements. The comprehensive range of factors identified provides the groundwork for developing tools that systematically capture the multiple contributory factors to patient safety.
患者在减少基层医疗环境中的伤害方面可发挥重要作用。从患者体验和反馈中学习有助于提高患者安全。目前很大程度上缺乏能体现患者对创建安全基层医疗的各种促成因素看法的证据。本研究旨在填补这一证据空白。
对来自澳大利亚东南部的34名患者及护理人员进行了4个焦点小组讨论和8次半结构式访谈。参与者被要求描述他们的基层医疗体验。录音被逐字转录,并使用约克郡促成因素框架(YCFF)在分析中确定导致安全事件的具体因素。还确定了数据中出现的其他因素并将其添加到分析框架中。
确定了13个导致基层医疗安全事件的因素。结合医院环境中YCFF存在的8个因素,发现了基层医疗环境中的5个独特因素。导致安全事件的5个独特的基层医疗促成因素代表了基层医疗系统内从当地工作条件到上游组织层面以及外部政策背景的一系列层面。这13个因素包括沟通、就医机会、患者因素、外部政策背景、尊严与尊重、一级-二级医疗衔接、连续护理、任务执行、任务特征、会诊时间、安全文化、团队因素和物理环境。
这种类型的患者及护理人员反馈可帮助基层医疗专业人员更好地理解和识别潜在的安全问题,并做出适当的服务改进。所确定的全面因素范围为开发系统捕捉影响患者安全的多种促成因素的工具奠定了基础。