Rhodes Penny, Campbell Stephen, Sanders Caroline
NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):253-63. doi: 10.1111/hex.12342. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Patient safety research has tended to focus on hospital settings, although most clinical encounters occur in primary care, and to emphasize practitioner errors, rather than patients' own understandings of safety.
To explore patients' understandings of safety in primary care.
Qualitative interviews were conducted with patients recruited from general practices in northwest England. Participants were asked basic socio-demographic information; thereafter, topics were largely introduced by interviewees themselves. Transcripts were coded and analysed using NVivo10 (qualitative data software), following a process of constant comparison.
Thirty-eight people (14 men, 24 women) from 19 general practices in rural, small town and city locations were interviewed. Many of their concerns (about access, length of consultation, relationship continuity) have been discussed in terms of quality, but, in the interviews, were raised as matters of safety. Three broad themes were identified: (i) trust and psycho-social aspects of professional-patient relationships; (ii) choice, continuity, access, and the temporal underpinnings of safety; and (iii) organizational and systems-level tensions constraining safety.
Conceptualizations of safety included common reliance on a bureaucratic framework of accreditation, accountability, procedural rules and regulation, but were also individual and context-dependent. For patients, safety is not just a property of systems, but personal and contingent and is realized in the interaction between doctor and patient. However, it is the systems approach that has dominated safety thinking, and patients' individualistic and relational conceptualizations are poorly accommodated within current service organization.
患者安全研究往往侧重于医院环境,尽管大多数临床接触发生在初级保健中,并且倾向于强调从业者的错误,而非患者自身对安全的理解。
探讨患者对初级保健中安全的理解。
对从英格兰西北部普通诊所招募的患者进行定性访谈。询问参与者基本的社会人口统计学信息;此后,话题主要由受访者自己引入。使用NVivo10(定性数据软件)对转录本进行编码和分析,采用持续比较的过程。
对来自农村、小镇和城市地区19家普通诊所的38人(14名男性,24名女性)进行了访谈。他们的许多担忧(关于就诊机会、咨询时长、关系连续性)在质量方面已有讨论,但在访谈中被作为安全问题提出。确定了三个广泛的主题:(i)医患关系中的信任和心理社会方面;(ii)选择、连续性、就诊机会以及安全的时间基础;(iii)限制安全的组织和系统层面的紧张关系。
安全的概念化包括通常依赖认证、问责、程序规则和规定的官僚框架,但也具有个体性和情境依赖性。对患者而言,安全不仅是系统的属性,更是个人的且视具体情况而定,并且在医患互动中得以实现。然而,主导安全思维的是系统方法,而患者的个人主义和关系概念化在当前的服务组织中未得到充分体现。