Filippidou Sevasti, Junier Thomas, Wunderlin Tina, Lo Chien-Chi, Li Po-E, Chain Patrick S, Junier Pilar
Laboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Laboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland ; Vital-IT group, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015 Apr 25;13:299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2015.04.002. eCollection 2015.
Microbial diversity studies based on metagenomic sequencing have greatly enhanced our knowledge of the microbial world. However, one caveat is the fact that not all microorganisms are equally well detected, questioning the universality of this approach. Firmicutes are known to be a dominant bacterial group. Several Firmicutes species are endospore formers and this property makes them hardy in potentially harsh conditions, and thus likely to be present in a wide variety of environments, even as residents and not functional players. While metagenomic libraries can be expected to contain endospore formers, endospores are known to be resilient to many traditional methods of DNA isolation and thus potentially undetectable. In this study we evaluated the representation of endospore-forming Firmicutes in 73 published metagenomic datasets using two molecular markers unique to this bacterial group (spo0A and gpr). Both markers were notably absent in well-known habitats of Firmicutes such as soil, with spo0A found only in three mammalian gut microbiomes. A tailored DNA extraction method resulted in the detection of a large diversity of endospore-formers in amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA and spo0A genes. However, shotgun classification was still poor with only a minor fraction of the community assigned to Firmicutes. Thus, removing a specific bias in a molecular workflow improves detection in amplicon sequencing, but it was insufficient to overcome the limitations for detecting endospore-forming Firmicutes in whole-genome metagenomics. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of understanding the specific methodological biases that can contribute to improve the universality of metagenomic approaches.
基于宏基因组测序的微生物多样性研究极大地增进了我们对微生物世界的认识。然而,一个需要注意的问题是,并非所有微生物都能被同样有效地检测到,这对这种方法的通用性提出了质疑。厚壁菌门是已知的主要细菌类群。几种厚壁菌门物种能够形成芽孢,这一特性使它们在潜在的恶劣条件下具有很强的生存能力,因此可能存在于各种各样的环境中,甚至作为常住菌群而非起作用的成员。虽然宏基因组文库有望包含产芽孢菌,但已知芽孢对许多传统的DNA分离方法具有抗性,因此可能无法检测到。在本研究中,我们使用该细菌类群特有的两个分子标记(spo0A和gpr)评估了73个已发表的宏基因组数据集中产芽孢厚壁菌门的代表性。在厚壁菌门的知名栖息地如土壤中,这两个标记均明显缺失,spo0A仅在三个哺乳动物肠道微生物群落中被发现。一种定制的DNA提取方法在16S rRNA和spo0A基因的扩增子测序中检测到了大量不同的产芽孢菌。然而,鸟枪法分类仍然很差,只有一小部分群落被归类为厚壁菌门。因此,消除分子工作流程中的特定偏差可改善扩增子测序中的检测,但仍不足以克服全基因组宏基因组学中检测产芽孢厚壁菌门的局限性。总之,本研究强调了理解可能有助于提高宏基因组方法通用性的特定方法偏差的重要性。