Kamps Amanda J, Dubay Shelli A, Langenberg Julie, Maes Roger K
1 College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, 2100 Main Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481, USA.
2 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 5301 Rib Mountain Drive, Wausau, Wisconsin 54401, USA.
J Wildl Dis. 2015 Jul;51(3):724-8. doi: 10.7589/2014-06-147. Epub 2015 May 14.
Blood samples are often collected from free-ranging wildlife for antibody detection. However, filter-paper (FP) strips are more cost efficient and easy to collect and store. We evaluated trapper-collected FP strips and body-cavity blood for canine distemper (CDV) and parvovirus (CPV-2) antibody detection in raccoons (Procyon lotor) and coyotes (Canis latrans). From 2008 to 2010, licensed trappers near Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US collected paired samples from harvested animals. Canine distemper antibodies were detected using virus neutralization and parvovirus antibodies were detected using hemagglutination inhibition. Titers ≥ 1:32 for CDV and ≥ 1:25 for CPV-2 were considered evidence of exposure. Using Cohen's kappa test of agreement, FP strip titers agreed with sera for CDV in coyotes (n = 28, K = 0.772) and raccoons (n = 29, K = 0.858) and for CPV-2 in coyotes (n = 40, K = 0.775) and raccoons (n = 70, K = 0.646). However, raccoons determined to be exposed to CPV-2 from sera were unexposed by FP strips in 35% of the samples. Titer results may be affected by quality and volume of blood samples, interval between collection and processing, small sample sizes, and diagnostic testing procedures. Filter-paper strips can be useful for detecting CDV and CPV-2 exposure in coyotes and raccoons with correct field sample collection and appropriate diagnostic testing procedures.
血液样本通常从自由放养的野生动物身上采集以检测抗体。然而,滤纸条(FP)成本效益更高,且易于采集和储存。我们评估了诱捕者采集的滤纸条样本和体腔血液样本,用于检测浣熊(北美浣熊)和郊狼(犬属)体内的犬瘟热病毒(CDV)和细小病毒(CPV-2)抗体。2008年至2010年期间,美国威斯康星州麦迪逊市和密尔沃基市附近的持牌诱捕者从捕获的动物身上采集了配对样本。使用病毒中和试验检测犬瘟热抗体,使用血凝抑制试验检测细小病毒抗体。CDV滴度≥1:32和CPV-2滴度≥1:25被视为接触过病毒的证据。使用科恩一致性kappa检验,滤纸条滴度与郊狼(n = 28,K = 0.772)和浣熊(n = 29,K = 0.858)体内CDV的血清滴度一致,与郊狼(n = 40,K = 0.775)和浣熊(n = 70,K = 0.646)体内CPV-2的血清滴度一致。然而,在35%的样本中,通过血清检测确定接触过CPV-2的浣熊,滤纸条检测结果显示未接触过。滴度结果可能受到血液样本质量和体积、采集与处理之间的间隔、样本量小以及诊断检测程序的影响。通过正确的野外样本采集和适当的诊断检测程序,滤纸条可用于检测郊狼和浣熊是否接触过CDV和CPV-2。