Suppr超能文献

带蒂结肠息肉切除术中注射与不注射肾上腺素预防息肉切除术后出血的比较

Comparison of clipping with and without epinephrine injection for the prevention of post-polypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colon polyps.

作者信息

Park Yehyun, Jeon Tae Joo, Park Ji Young, Park Soo Jung, Cheon Jae Hee, Kim Tae Il, Kim Won Ho, Hong Sung Pil

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;30(10):1499-506. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12994.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is the most common adverse event of colonoscopic polypectomy, especially in cases with large pedunculated polyps. To minimize the risk of PPB, several endoscopic preventive methods have been performed. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the rates of PPB following single (clipping alone) and combined (clipping plus epinephrine-saline injection) methods in prevention of PPB in large pedunculated polyps.

METHODS

Adult patients with pedunculated colorectal polyps with heads ≥ 10 mm were prospectively enrolled from March 2011 to January 2013. Patients were randomized to receive treatment of either clips alone (group A) or clips plus injection of epinephrine-saline (group B) prior to a conventional polypectomy. PPB rate in both groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients with 173 pedunculated colorectal polyps were enrolled. Groups A and B each had 74 patients, with 83 and 90 polyps, respectively. The mean head diameters were 17.2 ± 6.6 and 17.5 ± 6.7 mm in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.748). Immediate PPB (IPPB) occurred in 10 cases (12.0%) from group A and 13 cases (14.4%) from group B (P = 0.64). There were no cases of delayed PPB or perforation. Multivariate analysis showed that inadequate bowel preparation and large head diameter of polyp were independent risk factors for IPPB.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of IPPB is relatively high in cases with large pedunculated polyps, but these polyps can be successfully resected by snare polypectomy following use of the single prophylactic clipping method.

摘要

背景与目的

息肉切除术后出血(PPB)是结肠镜息肉切除术最常见的不良事件,尤其是在有大的有蒂息肉的病例中。为了将PPB的风险降至最低,已经实施了几种内镜预防方法。这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是比较单一(单纯夹闭)和联合(夹闭加肾上腺素盐水注射)方法预防大的有蒂息肉PPB后的PPB发生率。

方法

2011年3月至2013年1月前瞻性纳入了头部≥10mm的有蒂结直肠息肉成年患者。在进行常规息肉切除术之前,将患者随机分为单纯接受夹子治疗(A组)或夹子加肾上腺素盐水注射治疗(B组)。比较两组的PPB发生率。

结果

共纳入148例患者,有173个有蒂结直肠息肉。A组和B组各有74例患者,分别有83个和90个息肉。A组和B组息肉的平均头部直径分别为17.2±6.6mm和17.5± 6.7mm(P = 0.748)。A组有10例(12.0%)发生即时PPB(IPPB),B组有13例(14.4%)发生IPPB(P = 0.64)。没有延迟PPB或穿孔的病例。多因素分析表明,肠道准备不充分和息肉头部直径大是IPPB的独立危险因素。

结论

大的有蒂息肉病例中IPPB的发生率相对较高,但使用单一预防性夹闭方法后,这些息肉可通过圈套息肉切除术成功切除。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验