Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jul;94(1):148-154. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.040. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
Prophylactic application of a hemoclip has been suggested as an alternative to the use of an endoloop for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) when resecting large, pedunculated colorectal polyps. Therefore, this multicenter, randomized controlled trial investigated the efficacy of prophylactic hemoclip application to reduce PPB during the resection of large pedunculated polyps.
Large pedunculated polyps (≥10 mm in head diameter) were eligible for inclusion. Polyps were randomized into a study arm (where clips were applied before resection) and a control arm (without pretreatment). The primary outcome was the rate of PPB in each group. PPB included immediate PPB (IPPB) and delayed PPB (DPPB). IPPB was defined as blood oozing (≥1 minute) or active spurting occurring immediately after polyp resection. DPPB was defined as rectal bleeding, occurring after completion of the colonoscopy.
In total, 238 polyps from 204 patients were randomized into the clip arm (119 polyps) or the control arm (119 polyps). Overall bleeding adverse events were observed in 20 cases (IPPB, 16; DPPB, 4). The rate of overall PPB, IPPB, and DPPB was 8.4%, 6.7%, and 1.7%, respectively, for all polyps. The rate of overall PPB (clip 4.2% vs control 12.6%, P = .033) and IPPB (clip 2.5% vs control 10.9%, P = .017) was significantly lower in the clip arm than the control arm.
Prophylactic clipping before resecting large pedunculated polyps can reduce overall PPB and IPPB compared with no prior treatment. Therefore, prophylactic clipping may be considered before resection of large pedunculated polyps. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02156193.).
在切除大型有蒂结直肠息肉时,为预防息肉切除术后出血(PPB),有人建议预防性使用Hemoclip 夹替代肠夹。因此,这项多中心、随机对照试验研究了预防性使用Hemoclip 夹减少切除大型有蒂息肉时发生 PPB 的效果。
入选标准为直径≥10mm 的大型有蒂息肉。息肉随机分为研究组(夹闭前切除)和对照组(无预处理)。主要结局为两组的 PPB 发生率。PPB 包括即刻 PPB(IPPB)和延迟 PPB(DPPB)。IPPB 定义为息肉切除后立即出现渗血(≥1 分钟)或明显喷血。DPPB 定义为结肠镜检查完成后出现直肠出血。
共 204 例患者的 238 个息肉随机分为夹闭组(119 个息肉)和对照组(119 个息肉)。20 例(IPPB 16 例,DPPB 4 例)发生出血不良事件。所有息肉的总出血发生率分别为 8.4%、6.7%和 1.7%。夹闭组总 PPB、IPPB 和 DPPB 的发生率分别为 4.2%、2.5%和 1.7%,显著低于对照组(12.6%、10.9%)。夹闭组总 PPB(P=0.033)和 IPPB(P=0.017)发生率均显著低于对照组。
与无预先治疗相比,切除大型有蒂息肉前预防性夹闭可降低总 PPB 和 IPPB。因此,在切除大型有蒂息肉前可考虑预防性夹闭。(临床试验注册号:NCT02156193)。