Suppr超能文献

[导入期和第8周作为博赛匹韦治疗反应的预测工具:西班牙真实临床实践的回顾性研究]

[Lead-in period and week 8 as predictive tools for response to boceprevir therapy: a retrospective study of Spanish real clinical practice].

作者信息

Crespo Javier, Berenguer Marina, Pérez Francisco, Fernández Inmaculada, González Olga, Bárcena Rafael, Buti María, López Jesús, Calleja José Luis

机构信息

Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, España.

Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;38(9):517-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Most discontinuations due to lack of virological response occur during the first few weeks of hepatitis C virus (HCV) triple therapy. Improved knowledge of baseline factors and their correlation with boceprevir decision points may predict treatment success.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective study was conducted to describe the lead-in period as a clinical decision tool in HCV genotype 1 patients treated with boceprevir. Data were collected from the medical records of 186 consecutive patients distributed across 20 Spanish general hospitals.

RESULTS

This study included 171 patients. A total of 80% had fibrosis F3/F4, 74% were previously treated, and 26% were treatment-naïve. After the lead-in period, 54.5% of the patients had a reduction of ≥1 log10; this reduction occurred in 52.5% of those with advanced fibrosis. Boceprevir therapy was started in 94% of the patients. Discontinuations at week 4 were limited to null responders with cirrhosis. The baseline factors associated with virological response at week 4 were IL28B, previous response, and fibrosis score. At week 8, HCV-RNA was undetectable in 48.8% of the patients. The correlation between responses at weeks 8 and 12 was 88%.

CONCLUSION

In the Spanish clinical setting, lead-in was mainly used as a clinical decision point for non-responders with cirrhosis. The good correlation between stopping rules at weeks 8 and 12 could be used to anticipate discontinuation, thus saving adverse events and costs.

摘要

引言

大多数因缺乏病毒学应答而导致的治疗中断发生在丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)三联疗法的最初几周。更好地了解基线因素及其与博赛匹韦决策点的相关性可能预测治疗成功。

方法

进行了一项观察性回顾性研究,以描述导入期作为接受博赛匹韦治疗的HCV基因1型患者的临床决策工具。数据收集自分布于20家西班牙综合医院的186例连续患者的病历。

结果

本研究纳入171例患者。总共80%有F3/F4级纤维化,74%曾接受过治疗,26%为初治患者。导入期后,54.5%的患者HCV RNA水平降低≥1 log10;在晚期纤维化患者中这一比例为52.5%。94%的患者开始接受博赛匹韦治疗。第4周时的治疗中断仅限于肝硬化无应答者。与第4周病毒学应答相关的基线因素为IL28B、既往应答情况和纤维化评分。第8周时,48.8%的患者HCV RNA检测不到。第8周和第12周应答之间的相关性为88%。

结论

在西班牙的临床环境中,导入期主要用作肝硬化无应答者的临床决策点。第8周和第12周停药规则之间的良好相关性可用于预测停药,从而避免不良事件并节省费用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验