Kilinc Adnan, Ertas Umit
Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;73(7):1394.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.019. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
To evaluate quality of life (QoL) from a broad perspective by a comparison of Turkish patients undergoing orthognathic surgery to correct Angle Class III skeletal deformity with a control group composed of participants without dentofacial deformity using general health, generic oral health, and condition-specific QoL approaches.
Thirty patients who underwent orthognathic surgery to correct Class III relations (monomaxillary and bimaxillary groups) and 30 participants with Class I skeletal structure and good dentofacial harmony (control group) were evaluated. Condition-specific QoL through a 22-item Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), generic oral health-related QoL through a 14-item Short-Form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), and generic health-related QoL through a 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were assessed.
When the groups were compared, OQLQ scores showed a significant difference in the oral function domain only in the bimaxillary group (P < .05), and OHIP-14 scores showed significant differences in half the OHIP-14 subscale scores in the monomaxillary and bimaxillary groups (P < .05). The SF-36 scores showed significant differences only for the vitality domain in the monomaxillary group and the vitality and mental health domains in the bimaxillary group (P < .05).
For condition-specific and health-related QoL, the QoL of orthognathic surgical patients appeared to be similar to that of participants without dentofacial deformities. Oral health-related QoL of orthognathic surgical patients seemed moderately similar to that of participants without dentofacial deformities. The combined use of these methods is helpful for evaluating QoL from a larger perspective.
通过比较接受正颌手术以矫正安氏III类骨骼畸形的土耳其患者与由无牙颌面畸形参与者组成的对照组,采用一般健康、一般口腔健康和特定疾病生活质量方法,从广泛的角度评估生活质量(QoL)。
对30例接受正颌手术以矫正III类关系的患者(单颌和双颌组)和30例具有I类骨骼结构且牙颌面协调性良好的参与者(对照组)进行评估。通过22项正颌生活质量问卷(OQLQ)评估特定疾病生活质量,通过14项简化口腔健康影响量表(OHIP-14)评估一般口腔健康相关生活质量,通过36项简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)评估一般健康相关生活质量。
比较各组时,OQLQ评分仅在双颌组的口腔功能领域显示出显著差异(P <.05),OHIP-14评分在单颌组和双颌组的一半OHIP-14子量表评分中显示出显著差异(P <.05)。SF-36评分仅在单颌组的活力领域以及双颌组的活力和心理健康领域显示出显著差异(P <.05)。
对于特定疾病和健康相关的生活质量,正颌手术患者的生活质量似乎与无牙颌面畸形参与者的生活质量相似。正颌手术患者的口腔健康相关生活质量似乎与无牙颌面畸形参与者的生活质量适度相似。联合使用这些方法有助于从更广泛的角度评估生活质量。