Hamel Sophie, McNair Douglas S, Birkett Nicholas J, Mattison Donald R, Krantis Anthony, Krewski Daniel
McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada ; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada.
Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri USA.
Springerplus. 2015 May 1;4:209. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-0981-z. eCollection 2015.
To determine the level of off-label cancer therapy use in a population of female breast cancer patients and to establish whether this use was evidence-based.
A study was conducted by sampling Cerner's data warehouse for all women diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2000 and June 2009 who received at least one cancer therapy approved by the US-FDA during the study period. Drug encounters were considered off-label if the circumstances of use did not match the age or medical diagnoses specified on the product label at the time of study. The level of evidence for the use of these drugs in a breast cancer setting was evaluated from randomized phase III trials using a tiered approach.
The study included 2,663 women with a median age of 59 years. A total of 1,636 off-label encounters were recorded, representing 13.0% of all encounters. Of the 65 cancer therapies investigated, 55.4% were prescribed off-label. The drugs with the highest off-label use were, in a descending order, vinorelbine, carboplatin, bevacizumab, leuprolide, liposomal doxorubicin and cisplatin. Most off-label encounters were evidence-based and more likely to be associated with private insurance coverage, younger age, ethnicities other than Caucasian, smaller treatment centres and drugs with limited labeled indications that have a longer market history.
Off-label prescribing is common practice in oncology and is an integral component of breast cancer treatment strategies. While this practice tends to be associated with specific socio-demographic factors and disease characteristics, the majority of off-label encounters appear to be evidence-based.
确定女性乳腺癌患者群体中癌症治疗药物的非标签使用水平,并确定这种使用是否基于证据。
通过对Cerner数据仓库进行抽样研究,纳入2000年1月至2009年6月期间诊断为乳腺癌且在研究期间接受至少一种美国食品药品监督管理局(US-FDA)批准的癌症治疗药物的所有女性。如果使用情况与研究时产品标签上指定的年龄或医学诊断不匹配,则药物使用被视为非标签使用。使用分层方法从随机III期试验评估这些药物在乳腺癌治疗中的证据水平。
该研究纳入了2663名女性,中位年龄为59岁。共记录了1636次非标签使用情况,占所有使用情况的13.0%。在研究的65种癌症治疗药物中,55.4%为非标签处方。非标签使用最高的药物依次为长春瑞滨、卡铂、贝伐单抗、亮丙瑞林、脂质体阿霉素和顺铂。大多数非标签使用情况是基于证据的,并且更可能与私人保险覆盖、年龄较轻、非白种人种族、较小的治疗中心以及标签适应症有限且市场历史较长的药物相关。
非标签处方是肿瘤学中的常见做法,并且是乳腺癌治疗策略的一个组成部分。虽然这种做法往往与特定的社会人口统计学因素和疾病特征相关,但大多数非标签使用情况似乎是基于证据的。