Suppr超能文献

2006年至2012年美国门诊环境中口服氟喹诺酮类抗生素的非标签使用情况。

Off-label use of oral fluoroquinolone antibiotics in outpatient settings in the United States, 2006 to 2012.

作者信息

Almalki Ziyad S, Alahmari Abdullah K, Guo Jeff J, Cavanaugh Teresa M

机构信息

James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, Academic Health Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Sep;25(9):1042-51. doi: 10.1002/pds.4021. Epub 2016 May 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the practice pattern of off-label use of fluoroquinolones (FQs) in ambulatory settings and to identify the related risk factors.

METHODS

The National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys from 2006 through 2012 was used to identify subjects who received FQ off-label prescriptions. We defined off-label use as the use of FQs for indications other than those in the FDA-approved drug label. Descriptive statistics were calculated by using a series of weighted chi-squared statistics. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with off-label FQ drug use.

RESULTS

There were 93 million ambulatory visits in which an FQ was prescribed, and 53.16% of these visits involved the prescribing of FQs in an off-label manner. The percentage of off-label prescriptions was the highest among individuals ≥80 years old (61.6%) and male patients (60.9%). The FQ drug prescribed most for an off-label indication in our study was ciprofloxacin (29.5% of the total visits). The multivariate analysis showed that age of ≥80 years and male patient was significantly associated with off-label use of FQs (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.66, 1.72-7.80 and OR 3.26, 2.32-4.56, respectively). Medicaid or private insurance versus Medicare were associated with significantly higher off-label prescribing of FQs (OR 2.53, 1.28-5.01 and 1.77, 1.03-3.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The percentage of visits involving off-label FQs in US ambulatory settings is substantial. Efforts are needed consolidate and evaluate what high-quality scientific evidence is available and what is needed to support the safety and effectiveness of such off-label uses. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估门诊环境中氟喹诺酮类药物(FQs)的超说明书用药模式,并确定相关风险因素。

方法

利用2006年至2012年的国家门诊医疗护理调查来确定接受FQs超说明书处方的受试者。我们将超说明书用药定义为FQs用于美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的药品标签以外的适应症。使用一系列加权卡方统计量进行描述性统计。进行多因素逻辑回归以确定与FQs超说明书用药相关的因素。

结果

有9300万人次门诊开具了FQs处方,其中53.16%的门诊涉及超说明书开具FQs。超说明书处方比例在80岁及以上个体(61.6%)和男性患者(60.9%)中最高。在我们的研究中,用于超说明书适应症处方最多的FQs药物是环丙沙星(占总门诊量的29.5%)。多因素分析表明,80岁及以上年龄和男性患者与FQs超说明书用药显著相关(调整后的比值比(OR)分别为3.66,1.72 - 7.80和OR 3.26,2.32 - 4.56)。医疗补助或私人保险与医疗保险相比,FQs超说明书处方显著更高(OR分别为2.53,1.28 - 5.01和1.77,1.03 - 3.03)。

结论

美国门诊环境中涉及FQs超说明书用药的门诊比例相当大。需要努力整合和评估现有哪些高质量科学证据以及支持此类超说明书用药安全性和有效性还需要什么。版权所有© 2016约翰威立父子有限公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验