Suppr超能文献

对曾有意义未明的非典型性病变或意义未明的滤泡性病变的甲状腺结节进行粗针活检标本BRAFV600E突变分析的临床实用性评估结果。

Evaluation of the Clinical Usefulness of BRAFV600E Mutation Analysis of Core-Needle Biopsy Specimens in Thyroid Nodules with Previous Atypia of Undetermined Significance or Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance Results.

作者信息

Choi Sang Hyun, Baek Jung Hwan, Lee Jeong Hyun, Choi Young Jun, Song Dong Eun, Chung Ki-Wook, Kim Tae Yong, Shong Young Kee

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Asan Medical Center, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea.

2 Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Asan Medical Center, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Thyroid. 2015 Aug;25(8):897-903. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0606. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accurate diagnosis of thyroid nodules is important for making management decisions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis with core-needle biopsy (CNB+BRAF(V600E)) in thyroid nodules with previous atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesions of undetermined significance (FLUS) results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2011 to December 2012, 590 CNB+BRAF(V600E) mutation analyses were performed. We analyzed 200 nodules from 200 patients with previous AUS/FLUS results (22 men, 178 women; mean age, 48.6 years). The clinical usefulness of CNB+BRAF(V600E) was assessed by comparing the rates of conclusive results, the additional value of BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis, diagnostic performances, and therapeutic/diagnostic surgery results with those of CNB alone. For the subgroup analysis, the study patients were divided into those with nodules with previous AUS results and those with previous FLUS results.

RESULTS

All CNB+BRAF(V600E) procedures were well-tolerated. CNB+BRAF(V600E) did not show significantly better diagnostic performance than CNB alone in thyroid nodules with previous AUS/FLUS results. However, the conclusive result rate of CNB+BRAF(V600E) was improved in thyroid nodules with previous AUS/FLUS results (76.5% vs. 73.0%, p=0.016), especially with previous AUS results (81.1% vs. 76.4%, p=0.031). Of the 56 previous AUS result thyroid nodules with surgical management, BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis led to therapeutic surgery in 5.4% by decreasing unnecessary diagnostic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, CNB+BRAF(V600E) did not show significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than CNB alone. Although CNB+BRAF(V600E) may add additional value in nodules with previous AUS results, routinely adding BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis to CNB is not recommended.

摘要

背景

甲状腺结节的准确诊断对于制定治疗决策至关重要。本研究的目的是评估在先前意义不明确的非典型性病变(AUS)或意义不明确的滤泡性病变(FLUS)结果的甲状腺结节中,采用粗针穿刺活检联合BRAF(V600E)突变分析(CNB+BRAF(V600E))的临床实用性。

材料与方法

2011年1月至2012年12月,共进行了590次CNB+BRAF(V600E)突变分析。我们分析了200例先前有AUS/FLUS结果的患者的200个结节(男性22例,女性178例;平均年龄48.6岁)。通过比较确诊结果率、BRAF(V600E)突变分析的附加价值、诊断性能以及治疗/诊断性手术结果与单纯CNB的结果,评估CNB+BRAF(V600E)的临床实用性。对于亚组分析,将研究患者分为先前有AUS结果的结节患者和先前有FLUS结果的结节患者。

结果

所有CNB+BRAF(V600E)操作耐受性良好。在先前有AUS/FLUS结果的甲状腺结节中,CNB+BRAF(V600E)的诊断性能并不比单纯CNB显著更好。然而,先前有AUS/FLUS结果的甲状腺结节中,CNB+BRAF(V600E)的确诊结果率有所提高(76.5%对73.0%,p=0.016),尤其是先前有AUS结果的结节(81.1%对76.4%,p=0.031)。在56个接受手术治疗的先前有AUS结果的甲状腺结节中,BRAF(V600E)突变分析通过减少不必要的诊断性手术,使5.4%的患者接受了治疗性手术。

结论

总体而言,CNB+BRAF(V600E)的诊断准确性并不比单纯CNB显著更高。尽管CNB+BRAF(V600E)可能在先前有AUS结果的结节中增加附加价值,但不建议常规将BRAF(V600E)突变分析添加到CNB中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验