Tian Panwen, Shen Yongchun, Feng Mei, Zhu Jing, Song Haili, Wan Chun, Chen Lei, Wen Fuqiang
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Division of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China , Chengdu , China.
Postgrad Med. 2015 Jun;127(5):529-34. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2015.1048180. Epub 2015 May 15.
The diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) remains a clinical challenge. Many studies suggest that endostatin is a potential marker for MPE. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of endostatin with respect to MPE and to summarize the overall diagnostic performance of endostatin via a meta-analysis.
Pleural effusion samples from patients with both malignant and nonmalignant disease were collected, and the pleural levels of endostatin and carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) were subsequently measured. The diagnostic performances of endostatin and CEA were analyzed via standard receiver operator characteristic curve analysis methods, using the AUC as a measure of accuracy. The overall diagnostic accuracy of endostatin for MPE was summarized through a bivariate meta-analysis with standard method recommended.
Fifty-two patients with MPEs and 64 patients with benign pleural effusions (BPEs) were included this study. Pleural endostatin levels were significantly increased in the setting of MPE compared with BPE (104.78 ± 64.58 vs. 56.81 ± 28.84 ng/ml; p < 0.001). Using a cutoff value of 79.7 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity of endostatin in diagnosing MPE were shown to be 51.92% and 85.94%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.747. The combination of endostatin and CEA enhanced diagnostic performance with respect to MPE. In addition to this study, another eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic estimates were 0.69 for sensitivity and 0.78 for specificity. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio for endostatin were 3.16 and 0.40, respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 7.89, and the AUC of the summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.79.
Pleural levels of endostatin are increased in the setting of MPE. However, endostatin exhibits a limited efficacy for the diagnosis of MPE and shows a relatively low sensitivity. The assessment of endostatin in combination with CEA may enhance diagnostic accuracy with respect to MPE.
恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的诊断仍然是一项临床挑战。许多研究表明内皮抑素是MPE的一个潜在标志物。本研究旨在确定内皮抑素对MPE的诊断价值,并通过荟萃分析总结内皮抑素的总体诊断性能。
收集恶性和非恶性疾病患者的胸腔积液样本,随后测量胸腔内内皮抑素和癌胚抗原(CEA)水平。采用标准的受试者工作特征曲线分析方法,以曲线下面积(AUC)作为准确性的衡量指标,分析内皮抑素和CEA的诊断性能。通过推荐的标准方法进行双变量荟萃分析,总结内皮抑素对MPE的总体诊断准确性。
本研究纳入了52例MPE患者和64例良性胸腔积液(BPE)患者。与BPE相比,MPE患者胸腔内内皮抑素水平显著升高(104.78±64.58 vs. 56.81±28.84 ng/ml;p<0.001)。以内皮抑素截断值79.7 ng/ml诊断MPE时,其敏感性和特异性分别为51.92%和85.94%,AUC为0.747。内皮抑素与CEA联合使用可提高对MPE的诊断性能。除本研究外,另有8项研究纳入了本荟萃分析。汇总的诊断估计值为敏感性0.69,特异性0.78。内皮抑素的阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为3.16和0.40。诊断比值比为7.89,汇总受试者工作特征曲线的AUC为0.79。
MPE患者胸腔内内皮抑素水平升高。然而,内皮抑素对MPE的诊断效能有限,敏感性相对较低。内皮抑素与CEA联合评估可能提高对MPE的诊断准确性。