• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

延迟的遗产:维多利亚州医学委员会等待75年才找出犯有“专业方面臭名昭著行为”的医生。

A delayed inheritance: the Medical Board of Victoria's 75-year wait to find doctors guilty of "infamous conduct in a professional respect".

作者信息

Wolf Gabrielle

出版信息

J Law Med. 2015 Mar;22(3):568-87.

PMID:25980191
Abstract

The Medical Board of Victoria (Board) was created in 1844 to register "legally qualified medical practitioners". It was not until 1933, however, that the Board attained the power to remove from its register a doctor who had engaged in "infamous conduct in a professional respect" (the power), even though the General Council of Medical Education and Registration of the United Kingdom on which the Board was modelled had been granted the power 75 years earlier. This article argues that the delay in the Board's inheritance was attributable to successive Victorian Parliaments' distrust of the Board and that this attitude was unwarranted, at least from early in the 20th century. The article maintains that the granting of the power to the Board was a crucial event in the history of the regulation of the Victorian medical profession. This is illustrated both by the difficulty encountered by the medical profession in dealing with doctors' unethical conduct before 1933, and the Board's concern to use its new authority responsibly and appropriately to protect the public and the profession in the three years after it attained the power.

摘要

维多利亚医学委员会(委员会)成立于1844年,旨在登记“具有合法资质的执业医生”。然而,直到1933年,委员会才获得权力,将从事“专业方面的可耻行为”的医生从其注册名单中除名(这项权力),尽管作为委员会效仿对象的英国医学教育与注册总会早在75年前就已被授予此项权力。本文认为,委员会继承这项权力的延迟归因于维多利亚州历届议会对该委员会的不信任,而且至少从20世纪初起,这种态度就是毫无根据的。本文认为,授予委员会这项权力是维多利亚州医学行业监管历史上的一个关键事件。1933年之前医学行业在处理医生不道德行为时遇到的困难,以及委员会在获得该权力后的三年里谨慎且恰当地运用其新权力以保护公众和行业的关切,都说明了这一点。

相似文献

1
A delayed inheritance: the Medical Board of Victoria's 75-year wait to find doctors guilty of "infamous conduct in a professional respect".延迟的遗产:维多利亚州医学委员会等待75年才找出犯有“专业方面臭名昭著行为”的医生。
J Law Med. 2015 Mar;22(3):568-87.
2
Hartnett, Epstein, Van der Hope: Regulating Unconventional Doctors.哈特内特、爱泼斯坦、范德霍普:规范非传统医生
J Law Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):331-356.
3
Moritz Meyer and the Medical Board: Preventing Refugee Doctors from Practising Medicine in Victoria, Australia, 1937-1958.莫里茨·迈耶与医学委员会:1937年至1958年在澳大利亚维多利亚州阻止难民医生行医
J Law Med. 2018 Oct;26(1):61-88.
4
Monitoring a “Menace”: Peer Review and the Regulation of Substance-Addicted Doctors, 1933-1948.监控“威胁”:同行评审与对药物成瘾医生的监管,1933 - 1948年
J Law Med. 2017;24(3):597-615.
5
Four decades of complaints to a State Medical Board about graduates from one medical school: implications for change in self-regulation processes.
J Law Med. 2010 Feb;17(4):493-501.
6
Ketan Desai and the Medical Council of India: the road to perdition?凯坦·德赛与印度医学委员会:走向毁灭之路?
Indian J Med Ethics. 2010 Jul-Sep;7(3):134-5. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2010.048.
7
[When state authorisation was introduced for medical doctors in Norway].[挪威引入医生国家授权时]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Dec 13;127(24):3267-71.
8
Mayhem and medical students: image, conduct, and control in the Victorian and Edwardian London teaching hospital.
Soc Hist Med. 2002 Apr;15(1):45-64. doi: 10.1093/shm/15.1.45.
9
[A Belgian medical board during World War II or the bad outcome of the law concerning the "Board of Medical Doctors " from 1938 (first part)].第二次世界大战期间的一个比利时医学委员会,或1938年关于“医生委员会”的法律的不良后果(第一部分)
Rev Med Brux. 2010 May-Jun;31(3):185-92.
10
Late-term abortion: what can be learned from Royal Women's Hospital v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria?晚期堕胎:从皇家妇女医院诉维多利亚州医学从业者委员会一案中能学到什么?
Med J Aust. 2007 Apr 2;186(7):359-62. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01260.x.