Chaudery Muzzafer, Clark James, Dafydd Derf Ap, Dunn Joel, Bew Duncan, Wilson Mark H, Darzi Ara
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Surg Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 14.
Hemorrhage identification in trauma care is a major priority. Focused assessment in sonography for trauma (FAST) offers a rapid, reliable means of detecting torso bleeding. The aims of this study were to conduct a face, content, and construct validity assessment of a FAST simulator and establish a rigorous assessment tool.
Participants were requested to perform a FAST scan and state if any abnormality was found in each region. Metrics evaluated included time, errors, and missed targets. Accuracy of images obtained was assessed by 2 independent radiologists. Experts completed a face and content validity questionnaire at the end of the study.
The study took place in the simulation suite within the Academic Surgical Unit of the Department of Surgery and Cancer.
Novices had no prior experience with ultrasound, intermediates had less than 6 months experience with fewer than 50 FAST scans performed, and experts had more than 1 year of experience with greater than 100 FAST scans performed. There were 31 participants: 11 experts, 10 intermediates, and 10 novices.
The face and content validity questionnaire scored high marks across all categories and achieved an overall median realism score of 8 ± 1.5 on a Likert scale. Experts performed the FAST scan faster with more accuracy and fewer errors than other cohorts (p < 0.001). Both the novices and intermediates were the slowest, least accurate, and either missed or made the most errors when scanning the lung bases and spleen.
This study has established the face, content, and construct validities of a FAST simulator, which could be used to accelerate training for novices. Additionally, it has demonstrated a rigorous method for FAST assessment, which has proven to be effective and in doing so addressed some of the criticisms leveled against it.
在创伤护理中识别出血是首要任务。创伤重点超声评估(FAST)提供了一种快速、可靠的检测躯干出血的方法。本研究的目的是对FAST模拟器进行表面效度、内容效度和结构效度评估,并建立一个严格的评估工具。
要求参与者进行FAST扫描,并说明在每个区域是否发现任何异常。评估的指标包括时间、错误和漏检目标。由两名独立的放射科医生评估所获得图像的准确性。专家们在研究结束时完成了一份表面效度和内容效度问卷。
该研究在外科和癌症系学术外科单元的模拟套件中进行。
新手此前没有超声检查经验,中级人员有不到6个月的经验且进行的FAST扫描少于50次,专家有超过1年的经验且进行的FAST扫描超过100次。共有31名参与者:11名专家、10名中级人员和10名新手。
表面效度和内容效度问卷在所有类别中得分都很高,在李克特量表上的总体中位逼真度得分为8±1.5。与其他组相比,专家进行FAST扫描的速度更快、准确性更高且错误更少(p<0.001)。新手和中级人员在扫描肺底和脾脏时都是最慢、最不准确的,要么漏检要么出现的错误最多。
本研究确立了FAST模拟器的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度,可用于加速新手培训。此外,它还展示了一种严格的FAST评估方法,已证明是有效的,并且解决了一些针对它的批评。