University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):1019-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.064. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
We evaluated the face, content and construct validity of the novel da Vinci® Skills Simulator™ using the da Vinci Si™ Surgeon Console as the surgeon interface.
We evaluated a novel robotic surgical simulator for robotic surgery using the da Vinci Si Surgeon Console and Mimic™ virtual reality. Subjects were categorized as novice-no surgical training, intermediate-surgical training with fewer than 100 robotic cases or expert-100 or more primary surgeon robotic cases. Each participant completed 10 virtual reality exercises with 3 repetitions and a questionnaire with a 1 to 10 visual analog scale to assess simulator realism (face validity) and training usefulness (content validity). The simulator recorded performance based on specific metrics. The performance of experts, intermediates and novices was compared (construct validity) using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
We studied 16 novices, 32 intermediates with a median surgical experience of 6 years (range 1 to 37) and a median of 0 robotic cases (range 0 to 50), and 15 experts with a median of 315 robotic cases (range 100 to 800). Participants rated the virtual reality and console experience as very realistic (median visual analog scale score 8/10) while expert surgeons rated the simulator as a very useful training tool for residents (10/10) and fellows (9/10). Experts outperformed intermediates and novices in almost all metrics (median overall score 88.3% vs 75.6% and 62.1%, respectively, between group p<0.001).
We confirmed the face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic skill simulator that uses the da Vinci Si Surgeon Console. Although it is currently limited to basic skill training, this device is likely to influence robotic surgical training across specialties.
我们使用达芬奇 Si 外科医生控制台作为外科医生接口,评估新型达芬奇技能模拟器的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。
我们使用达芬奇 Si 外科医生控制台和 Mimic 虚拟现实技术评估了一种新型机器人手术模拟器。研究对象被分为无手术培训的新手、手术培训少于 100 例机器人手术的中级医生或 100 例或更多主要外科医生机器人手术的专家。每位参与者都完成了 10 项虚拟现实练习,每项练习重复 3 次,并填写了一份包含 1 到 10 的视觉模拟量表的问卷,以评估模拟器的逼真度(表面效度)和培训有用性(内容效度)。模拟器根据特定指标记录性能。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较专家、中级医生和新手的表现(结构效度)。
我们研究了 16 名新手、32 名中级医生,他们的中位手术经验为 6 年(范围为 1 至 37 年),中位机器人手术经验为 0 例(范围为 0 至 50 例),以及 15 名专家,他们的中位机器人手术经验为 315 例(范围为 100 至 800 例)。参与者认为虚拟现实和控制台体验非常逼真(中位数视觉模拟量表评分为 8/10),而专家外科医生认为模拟器是住院医师(10/10)和研究员(9/10)非常有用的培训工具。专家在几乎所有指标上的表现都优于中级医生和新手(总体中位数评分为 88.3%、75.6%和 62.1%,组间差异具有统计学意义,p<0.001)。
我们证实了新型达芬奇技能模拟器的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度,该模拟器使用达芬奇 Si 外科医生控制台。尽管目前它仅限于基本技能培训,但该设备可能会影响跨专业的机器人手术培训。