Manuck Tracy A, Barbour Kelli, Janicki Lindsay, Blackwell Sean C, Berghella Vincenzo
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; for the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee, Washington, DC.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;213(3):405.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 May 14.
We sought to evaluate the rate of conversion of Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) annual meeting abstract presentations to full manuscript publications over time.
Full manuscript publications corresponding to all SMFM oral abstracts 2003 through 2010 inclusive, and SMFM poster abstracts in 2003, 2005, 2007, and 2009 were manually searched in PubMed. An abstract was considered to "match" a full publication if the abstract and publication titles as well as main methods and results were similar and the abstract first author was a publication author. In cases of uncertainty, the abstract-publication match was reviewed by a second physician researcher. Time to publication, publication rates over time, and publication rates among US vs non-US authors were examined. PubMed identification numbers were also collected to determine if >1 abstract contributed to a manuscript. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum, analysis of variance, t test, and logistic regression.
In all, 3281 abstracts presented at SMFM over the study period, including 629 orals (63 main plenary, 64 fellows plenary, 502 concurrent), were reviewed. Of 3281, 1780 (54.3%) were published, generating 1582 unique publications. Oral abstracts had a consistently higher rate of conversion to publications vs posters (77.1% vs 48.8%, P < .001). The median time to publication was 19 (interquartile range, 9-36) months, and was significantly shorter for orals vs posters (11 vs 21 months, P < .001). Over the study period, rates of publication of orals remained constant, but rates of publication of posters were lower in 2007 and 2009 compared to 2003 and 2005. Publications related to SMFM abstracts were published in 194 different journals, most commonly American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (39.8%), Obstetrics and Gynecology (9.7%), and Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (6.5%). Publication rates were higher if the abstract's first author was affiliated with a non-US institution (64.8% vs 51.1%, P < .001) and if the abstract received an award (82.7% vs 53.3%, P < .001). In regression models, oral presentation at SMFM, first author affiliation with a non-US institution, submission for American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology SMFM special issue, and year of abstract presentation at SMFM were associated with full manuscript publication.
From 2003 through 2010, full manuscript publication rates of SMFM abstracts were high and consistent, and time to publication decreased/improved across the study period for oral presentations.
我们试图评估随着时间推移,母胎医学协会(SMFM)年会摘要报告转化为完整手稿发表的比例。
在PubMed中手动检索了2003年至2010年(含)所有SMFM口头摘要以及2003年、2005年、2007年和2009年SMFM壁报摘要对应的完整手稿发表情况。如果摘要与发表的标题、主要方法和结果相似,且摘要的第一作者是发表文章的作者,则该摘要被视为与完整发表“匹配”。如有不确定情况,由另一位医生研究员审核摘要与发表的匹配情况。研究了发表时间、随时间的发表率以及美国与非美国作者的发表率。还收集了PubMed识别号,以确定是否有>1篇摘要对一篇手稿有贡献。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验、方差分析、t检验和逻辑回归分析数据。
在研究期间,共审查了在SMFM会议上展示的3281篇摘要,其中包括629篇口头摘要(63篇大会主题演讲、64篇学员大会演讲、502篇平行会议演讲)。在3281篇摘要中,1780篇(54.3%)发表,产生了1582篇独立的出版物。口头摘要转化为出版物的比例始终高于壁报摘要(77.1%对48.8%,P <.001)。发表的中位时间为19个月(四分位间距,9 - 36个月),口头摘要的发表时间明显短于壁报摘要(11个月对21个月,P <.001)。在研究期间,口头摘要的发表率保持不变,但2007年和2009年壁报摘要的发表率低于2003年和2005年。与SMFM摘要相关的出版物发表在194种不同的期刊上,最常见的是《美国妇产科学杂志》(39.8%)、《妇产科学》(9.7%)和《母胎与新生儿医学杂志》(6.5%)。如果摘要的第一作者隶属于非美国机构,发表率较高(64.8%对51.1%,P <.001),且如果摘要获得奖项,发表率也较高(82.7%对53.3%,P <.001)。在回归模型中,在SMFM会议上进行口头报告、第一作者隶属于非美国机构、提交至《美国妇产科学杂志》SMFM特刊以及在SMFM会议上展示摘要的年份与完整手稿发表相关。
从2003年至2010年,SMFM摘要的完整手稿发表率较高且一致,在研究期间,口头报告的发表时间有所缩短/改善。