• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄是否影响心脏再同步治疗的应用和疗效?

Does Age Influence Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Use and Outcome?

机构信息

Veterans Administration Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California.

Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Jun;3(6):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jchf.2015.01.012
PMID:25982109
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to describe the use of CRT-D and its association with survival for older patients.

BACKGROUND

Many patients who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) in practice are older than those included in clinical trials.

METHODS

We identified patients undergoing ICD implantation in the National Cardiovascular Disease Registry (NCDR) ICD registry from 2006 to 2009, who also met clinical trial criteria for CRT, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, QRS ≥120 ms, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV. NCDR registry data were linked to the social security death index to determine the primary outcome of time to death from any cause. We identified 70,854 patients from 1,187 facilities who met prior trial criteria for CRT-D. The mean age of the 58,147 patients receiving CRT-D was 69.4 years with 6.4% of patients age 85 or older. CRT use was 80% or higher among candidates in all age groups. Follow-up was available for 42,285 patients age ≥65 years at 12 months.

RESULTS

Receipt of CRT-D was associated with better survival at 1 year (82.1% vs. 77.1%, respectively) and 4 years (54.0% vs. 46.2% , respectively) than in those receiving only an ICD (p < 0.001). The CRT association with improved survival was not different for different age groups (p = 0.86 for interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 80% of older patients undergoing ICD implantation who were candidates for a CRT-D received the combined device. Mortality in older patients undergoing ICD implantation was high but was lower for those receiving CRT-D.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)的使用情况及其与患者生存的关系。

背景

在实践中,许多接受心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)的患者比临床试验中纳入的患者年龄更大。

方法

我们从 2006 年至 2009 年确定了在全国心血管疾病登记处(NCDR)ICD 登记处接受植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入的患者,这些患者也符合 CRT 的临床试验标准,包括左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%、QRS 波≥120ms 和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能 III 或 IV 级。NCDR 登记处的数据与社会安全死亡索引相关联,以确定任何原因导致的死亡时间这一首要结局。我们从 1187 个中心确定了符合 CRT-D 先前临床试验标准的 70854 名患者。接受 CRT-D 的 58147 名患者的平均年龄为 69.4 岁,其中 6.4%的患者年龄在 85 岁或以上。在所有年龄组中,符合 CRT-D 条件的患者中,有 80%或以上的患者接受了 CRT-D。在≥65 岁的 42285 名患者中,12 个月时可获得随访。

结果

与仅接受 ICD 治疗的患者相比,接受 CRT-D 治疗的患者在 1 年(分别为 82.1%和 77.1%)和 4 年(分别为 54.0%和 46.2%)时的生存率更高(p<0.001)。不同年龄组 CRT-D 与改善生存率的相关性无差异(p=0.86,交互作用)。

结论

在接受 ICD 植入的老年患者中,超过 80%的符合 CRT-D 条件的患者接受了联合设备治疗。接受 ICD 植入的老年患者死亡率较高,但接受 CRT-D 治疗的患者死亡率较低。

相似文献

1
Does Age Influence Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Use and Outcome?年龄是否影响心脏再同步治疗的应用和疗效?
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Jun;3(6):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 May 14.
2
Reduced long-term overall mortality in heart failure patients with prolonged QRS treated with CRT combined with ICD vs. heart failure patients with narrow QRS treated with ICD only.与仅接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗的窄QRS波心力衰竭患者相比,接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)联合ICD治疗的宽QRS波心力衰竭患者长期总体死亡率降低。
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1374-82. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv347. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
3
Use and Outcomes of Dual Chamber or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators Among Older Patients Requiring Ventricular Pacing in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry.在国家心血管数据注册植入式心脏复律除颤器登记处中,需要心室起搏的老年患者使用双腔或心脏再同步治疗除颤器的情况和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2035470. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35470.
4
Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator improves long-term survival compared with cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker in patients with a class IA indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy: data from the Contak Italian Registry.心脏再同步治疗除颤器与心脏再同步治疗起搏器相比,可改善 I 类心脏再同步治疗适应证患者的长期生存率:来自 Contak 意大利注册研究的数据。
Europace. 2013 Sep;15(9):1273-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut032. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.女性与男性的心脏再同步治疗:来自国家心血管数据登记处的观察性比较疗效研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2 Suppl 1):S4-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001548. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
6
Time-dependent risk reduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: a MADIT-RIT sub-study.心脏再同步治疗患者室性心律失常时间依赖性风险降低:MADIT-RIT 亚研究。
Europace. 2015 Jul;17(7):1085-91. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv008. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
7
Left ventricular ejection fraction normalization in cardiac resynchronization therapy and risk of ventricular arrhythmias and clinical outcomes: results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial.心脏再同步治疗中左心室射血分数的正常化与室性心律失常和临床结局的风险:来自多中心自动除颤器植入试验与心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)试验的结果。
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):2278-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011283. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
8
Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Eligible Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry.在接受植入式心脏复律除颤器的合格患者中使用心脏再同步治疗:来自国家心血管数据注册植入式心脏复律除颤器登记处的见解。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 May 1;2(5):561-565. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5388.
9
Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的长期预后的性别差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 29;4(7):e002013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002013.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of CRT-D Versus Defibrillator Alone in HF Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.比较 CRT-D 与单独除颤器在伴有中重度慢性肾脏病的 HF 患者中的疗效。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;66(23):2618-2629. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.097.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes following cardiac resynchronisation therapy in older people.老年人心脏再同步治疗的结果。
Age Ageing. 2023 Nov 2;52(11). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad222.
2
Utilization and Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure - A Report From the CHART-2 Study.慢性心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗的应用与疗效——CHART-2研究报告
Circ Rep. 2022 May 25;4(6):264-273. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0036. eCollection 2022 Jun 10.
3
Sex, Race, and Age Differences of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy RCTs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
心脏再同步治疗随机对照试验中心血管结局的性别、种族和年龄差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
CJC Open. 2021 Sep 15;3(12 Suppl):S192-S201. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.09.005. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Decision-making regarding primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators among older adults.老年人植入式心脏复律除颤器一级预防的决策。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/clc.23315. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
A novel method to enable biventricular defibrillator to biventricular pacemaker downgrade involving DF4 defibrillator lead.一种涉及DF4除颤器导线的使双心室除颤器降级为双心室起搏器的新方法。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2018 Sep 25;4(12):598-600. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2018.09.006. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
[Chronic heart failure in older patients : Updated national healthcare guidelines on chronic heart failure from a geriatric perspective].[老年患者慢性心力衰竭:从老年医学角度更新的慢性心力衰竭国家医疗指南]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Feb;51(2):165-168. doi: 10.1007/s00391-018-1371-2. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
7
Heart Failure in Older Adults.老年人的心衰
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Sep;32(9):1140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 10.
8
Geographic and Temporal Variation in Cardiac Implanted Electric Devices to Treat Heart Failure.用于治疗心力衰竭的心脏植入式电子装置的地理和时间差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 28;5(8):e003532. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003532.