Suppr超能文献

《Maudsley 门诊治疗神经性厌食症及相关疾病研究》(MOSAIC):广泛定义的神经性厌食症门诊患者中,Maudsley 神经性厌食症治疗模式(MANTRA)与专科支持性临床管理(SSCM)的比较:一项随机对照试验。

The Maudsley Outpatient Study of Treatments for Anorexia Nervosa and Related Conditions (MOSAIC): Comparison of the Maudsley Model of Anorexia Nervosa Treatment for Adults (MANTRA) with specialist supportive clinical management (SSCM) in outpatients with broadly defined anorexia nervosa: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, King's College London.

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Biostatistics, King's College London.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Aug;83(4):796-807. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000019. Epub 2015 May 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anorexia nervosa (AN) in adults has poor outcomes, and treatment evidence is limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of a novel, targeted psychological therapy for AN (Maudsley Model of Anorexia Nervosa Treatment for Adults; MANTRA) compared with Specialist Supportive Clinical Management (SSCM).

METHOD

One hundred forty-two outpatients with broadly defined AN (body mass index [BMI] ≤ 18.5 kg/m²) were randomly allocated to receive 20 to 30 weekly sessions (depending on clinical severity) plus add-ons (4 follow-up sessions, optional sessions with dietician and with carers) of MANTRA (n = 72) or SSCM (n = 70). Assessments were administered blind to treatment condition at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after randomization. The primary outcome was BMI at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included eating disorders symptomatology, other psychopathology, neuro-cognitive and social cognition, and acceptability. Additional service utilization was also assessed. Outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Both treatments resulted in significant improvements in BMI and reductions in eating disorders symptomatology, distress levels, and clinical impairment over time, with no statistically significant difference between groups at either 6 or 12 months. Improvements in neuro-cognitive and social-cognitive measures over time were less consistent. One SSCM patient died. Compared with SSCM, MANTRA patients rated their treatment as significantly more acceptable and credible at 12 months. There was no significant difference between groups in additional service consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatments appear to have value as first-line outpatient interventions for patients with broadly defined AN. Longer term outcomes remain to be evaluated.

摘要

目的

成人厌食症(AN)的结局较差,且治疗证据有限。本研究评估了一种新型、针对成人厌食症的靶向心理治疗(Maudsley 模型治疗成人厌食症;MANTRA)与专科支持性临床管理(SSCM)相比的疗效和可接受性。

方法

142 名广义定义的 AN 门诊患者(体重指数 [BMI] ≤ 18.5 kg/m²)被随机分配接受 20 至 30 次每周治疗(取决于临床严重程度),外加 MANTRA(n=72)或 SSCM(n=70)的附加治疗(4 次随访治疗、营养师和照顾者可选治疗)。在随机分组后 6 个月和 12 个月时进行盲法评估。主要结局是 12 个月时的 BMI。次要结局包括进食障碍症状、其他精神病理学、神经认知和社会认知,以及可接受性。还评估了额外的服务利用情况。使用线性混合模型分析结果。

结果

两种治疗均导致 BMI 显著改善,进食障碍症状、痛苦水平和临床损伤减少,6 个月和 12 个月时组间无统计学差异。随着时间的推移,神经认知和社会认知测量的改善不太一致。1 名 SSCM 患者死亡。与 SSCM 相比,MANTRA 患者在 12 个月时对治疗的可接受性和可信度评分显著更高。两组在额外服务消耗方面无显著差异。

结论

两种治疗方法似乎都可以作为广义定义的 AN 患者的一线门诊干预措施。还需要评估更长期的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验