Andony Louise J, Tay Elaine, Allen Karina L, Wade Tracey D, Hay Phillipa, Touyz Stephen, McIntosh Virginia V W, Treasure Janet, Schmidt Ulrike H, Fairburn Christopher G, Erceg-Hurn David M, Fursland Anthea, Crosby Ross D, Byrne Susan M
School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia.
Centre for Clinical Interventions, Perth, Western Australia.
Int J Eat Disord. 2015 Dec;48(8):1170-5. doi: 10.1002/eat.22455.
To develop a psychotherapy rating scale to measure therapist adherence in the Strong Without Anorexia Nervosa (SWAN) study, a multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing three different psychological treatments for adults with anorexia nervosa. The three treatments under investigation were Enhanced Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT-E), the Maudsley Anorexia Nervosa Treatment for Adults (MANTRA), and Specialist Supportive Clinical Management (SSCM).
The SWAN Psychotherapy Rating Scale (SWAN-PRS) was developed, after consultation with the developers of the treatments, and refined. Using the SWAN-PRS, two independent raters initially rated 48 audiotapes of treatment sessions to yield inter-rater reliability data. One rater proceeded to rate a total of 98 audiotapes from 64 trial participants.
The SWAN-PRS demonstrated sound psychometric properties, and was considered a reliable measure of therapist adherence. The three treatments were highly distinguishable by independent raters, with therapists demonstrating significantly more behaviors consistent with the actual allocated treatment compared to the other two treatment modalities. There were no significant site differences in therapist adherence observed.
The findings provide support for the internal validity of the SWAN study. The SWAN-PRS was deemed suitable for use in other trials involving CBT-E, MANTRA, or SSCM.
在“无神经性厌食症而坚强(SWAN)”研究中开发一种心理治疗评定量表,以测量治疗师的依从性。该研究是一项多中心随机对照试验,比较针对成年神经性厌食症患者的三种不同心理治疗方法。所研究的三种治疗方法分别是强化认知行为疗法(CBT-E)、成人神经性厌食症莫兹利治疗法(MANTRA)和专科支持性临床管理(SSCM)。
在与各治疗方法的开发者协商后,开发并完善了SWAN心理治疗评定量表(SWAN-PRS)。使用SWAN-PRS,两名独立评分者最初对48段治疗会话录音进行评分,以得出评分者间的可靠性数据。一名评分者接着对来自64名试验参与者的总共98段录音进行评分。
SWAN-PRS显示出良好的心理测量特性,被认为是治疗师依从性的可靠测量方法。独立评分者能够高度区分这三种治疗方法,与其他两种治疗方式相比,治疗师表现出与实际分配治疗方法更一致的行为。未观察到治疗师依从性方面存在显著的地点差异。
研究结果为SWAN研究的内部效度提供了支持。SWAN-PRS被认为适用于其他涉及CBT-E、MANTRA或SSCM的试验。