Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):718-25. doi: 10.7326/M14-2326.
Cancer screening is one approach to reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality rates. Screening strategies vary in intensity. Higher-intensity strategies are not necessarily higher value. High-value strategies provide a degree of benefits that clearly justifies the harms and costs incurred; low-value screening provides limited or no benefits to justify the harms and costs. When cancer screening leads to benefits, an optimal intensity of screening maximizes value. Some aspects of screening practices, especially overuse and underuse, are low value.
Screening strategies for asymptomatic, average-risk adults for 5 common types of cancer were evaluated by reviewing clinical guidelines and evidence syntheses from the American College of Physicians (ACP), U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Cancer Society, American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Urological Association. "High value" was defined as the lowest screening intensity threshold at which organizations agree about screening recommendations for each type of cancer and "low value" as agreement about not recommending overly intensive screening strategies. This information is supplemented with additional findings from randomized, controlled trials; modeling studies; and studies of costs or resource use, including information found in the National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query and UpToDate. The ACP provides high-value care screening advice for 5 common types of cancer; the specifics are outlined in this article. The ACP strongly encourages clinicians to adopt a cancer screening strategy that focuses on reaching all eligible persons with these high-value screening options while reducing overly intensive, low-value screening.
癌症筛查是降低癌症相关发病率和死亡率的一种方法。筛查策略的强度各不相同。高强度策略不一定具有更高的价值。高价值策略提供了一定程度的获益,明确证明了所涉及的危害和成本是合理的;低价值筛查提供的获益有限或无法证明其危害和成本是合理的。当癌症筛查带来获益时,最佳的筛查强度可实现最大的价值。一些筛查实践方面,尤其是过度使用和使用不足,具有较低的价值。
通过审查美国医师学院(ACP)、美国预防服务工作组(U.S. Preventive Services Task Force)、美国家庭医师学会(American Academy of Family Physicians)、美国癌症协会(American Cancer Society)、美国妇产科医师学会(American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists)、美国胃肠病学会(American Gastroenterological Association)和美国泌尿外科学会(American Urological Association)的临床指南和证据综合报告,评估了针对 5 种常见类型癌症的无症状、平均风险成年人的筛查策略。“高价值”定义为各组织就每种癌症的筛查建议达成一致的最低筛查强度阈值,“低价值”则指各组织就不推荐过度密集的筛查策略达成一致。这一信息由来自随机对照试验、模型研究以及成本或资源利用研究的额外发现进行补充,包括美国国家癌症研究所的医师数据查询(Physician Data Query)和 UpToDate 中提供的信息。ACP 为 5 种常见类型的癌症提供了高价值的癌症筛查建议;本文详细介绍了这些建议。ACP 强烈鼓励临床医生采用癌症筛查策略,重点关注使用这些高价值的筛查选项来覆盖所有符合条件的人群,同时减少过度密集、低价值的筛查。