Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06351, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 4;14(1):15418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66253-0.
International liver societies recommend hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance for those at high-risk of developing HCC. While previous studies have shown the benefits of surveillance for middle-aged patients, but its necessity for elderly patients is unclear. This study aimed to assess the benefits of HCC surveillance in the elderly by comparing diagnosis mode of HCC. Consecutive, elderly patients aged 75 years or older who were newly diagnosed with HCC were screened at our institution between January 2009 and December 2021. Patients were grouped into those who were diagnosed with HCC during surveillance (n = 235, surveillance group) and those who were diagnosed with HCC due to symptoms (n = 184, symptomatic group). The study outcome was overall survival. It was compared in the overall cohort and a propensity score (PS)-matched cohort. Early-stage diagnosis was more frequent in the surveillance group than in the symptomatic group (mUICC stage I/II: 72.3% vs. 39.1%, p < 0.001). The overall survival rate was better in the surveillance group than in the symptomatic group (median 4.4 vs. 2.1 years, log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable-adjusted models, the hazard ratio (HR) of mortality of the surveillance group compared to the symptomatic group was 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.87). However, further adjustment for the tumor stage markedly attenuated this association, which was no longer statistically significant (adjusted HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.54-1.02). In the PS-matched cohort analysis, outcomes were similar when the PS matching variables included the tumor stage. In contrast, when PS matching variables did not include the tumor stage, outcomes were better for the surveillance group. The surveillance group of elderly patients showed better survival than the symptomatic group, which was largely explained by earlier tumor stage at diagnosis. This suggests that the overall outcome of elderly HCC patients could be improved by increasing surveillance-detected cases compared to symptom-driven cases.
国际肝脏学会建议对有发生肝细胞癌(HCC)风险的患者进行 HCC 监测。虽然先前的研究表明监测对中年患者有益,但对于老年患者的必要性尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过比较 HCC 的诊断模式,评估老年患者 HCC 监测的获益。我们在机构内筛选了 2009 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间新诊断为 HCC 的年龄 75 岁或以上的连续老年患者。患者分为监测时诊断为 HCC 的患者(n = 235,监测组)和因症状诊断为 HCC 的患者(n = 184,症状组)。研究结果为总生存。在总体队列和倾向评分(PS)匹配队列中进行了比较。监测组的早期诊断更为常见(mUICC 分期 I/II:72.3%比 39.1%,p<0.001)。监测组的总生存率优于症状组(中位 4.4 比 2.1 年,对数秩检验 p<0.001)。在多变量调整模型中,与症状组相比,监测组的死亡风险比(HR)为 0.64(95%置信区间(CI):0.47-0.87)。然而,进一步调整肿瘤分期显著减弱了这种关联,且不再具有统计学意义(调整 HR = 0.75;95%CI:0.54-1.02)。在 PS 匹配队列分析中,当 PS 匹配变量包括肿瘤分期时,结果相似。相反,当 PS 匹配变量不包括肿瘤分期时,监测组的结果更好。老年患者的监测组的生存情况优于症状组,这在很大程度上归因于诊断时肿瘤分期更早。这表明与症状驱动的病例相比,通过增加监测发现的病例,老年 HCC 患者的总体预后可以得到改善。