Jacobs Ivo F, Osvath Mathias
Lund University.
J Comp Psychol. 2015 May;129(2):89-120. doi: 10.1037/a0038746.
String pulling is one of the most widely used paradigms in comparative psychology. First documented 2 millennia ago, it has been a well-established scientific paradigm for a century. More than 160 bird and mammal species have been tested in over 200 studies with countless methodological variations. The paradigm can be used to address a wide variety of issues on animal cognition; for example, what animals understand about contact and connection as well as whether they rely on perceptual feedback, grasp the functionality of strings, generalize across conditions, apply their knowledge flexibly, and possess insight. Mammals are typically tested on a horizontal configuration, birds on a vertical one, making the studies difficult to compare; in particular, pulling a string vertically requires better coordination and attention. A species' performance on the paradigm is often influenced by its ecology, especially concerning whether limbs are used for foraging. Many other factors can be of importance and should be considered. The string-pulling paradigm is easy to administer, vary, and apply to investigate a wide array of cognitive abilities. Although it can be and has been used to compare species, divergent methods and unclear reporting have limited its comparative utility. With increasing research standards, the paradigm is expected to become an even more fundamental tool in comparative psychology.
拉绳实验是比较心理学中应用最广泛的范式之一。该实验最早于两千年前被记录下来,在一个世纪以来一直是一个成熟的科学范式。在超过200项研究中,对160多种鸟类和哺乳动物进行了测试,研究方法不计其数。该范式可用于解决动物认知方面的各种问题;例如,动物对接触和连接的理解,以及它们是否依赖感知反馈、掌握绳子的功能、在不同条件下进行归纳、灵活运用知识以及具备洞察力。哺乳动物通常在水平装置上进行测试,鸟类则在垂直装置上测试,这使得各项研究难以比较;特别是,垂直拉绳需要更好的协调性和注意力。一个物种在该范式下的表现通常受其生态影响,尤其是在是否使用四肢觅食方面。许多其他因素也可能很重要,应该加以考虑。拉绳范式易于实施、改变,可用于研究广泛的认知能力。尽管它可以而且已经被用于比较不同物种,但方法的差异和报告的不清晰限制了其比较效用。随着研究标准的提高,该范式有望成为比较心理学中更基础的工具。