Schlitz Ryne S, Schwertz Joseph M, Eberhardt Alan W, Gilbert Shawn R
*Department of Biomedical Engineering †Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Dec;35(8):e93-7. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000450.
Good outcomes have been described for pediatric lateral condyle fractures treated by open reduction and fixation using either screws or Kirschner wires (K-wires). No studies have compared the biomechanical properties of the 2 fixation methods. We hypothesized that screw fixation would be more biomechanically stable than K-wire fixation.
Synthetic humerus models were used for biomechanical testing, following a previously published protocol. A miter saw was used to make an oblique cut to simulate a Milch type II fracture. Fractures were anatomically reduced and fixed with either 2 divergent 0.062-inch K-wires placed bicortically or a 4.0-mm lag screw placed obliquely (perpendicular to the fracture line). Specimens were then embedded in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement for testing. Mechanical testing using displacement control was performed applying compression or distraction from 0 to 1.5 mm at a rate of 0.5 mm/s for 10 cycles. The maximum force was calculated based on the maximum force averaged over the 10 cycles. Stiffness was calculated based on the slope of the force-displacement curve of the 10th cycle. A 2-sample t test was used to determine significant differences between the stiffness and maximum force comparing the K-wire and screw groups. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Stiffness and maximum force in tension testing were significantly greater with screw fixation compared with K-wire fixation. Testing in compression revealed statistically significant increased maximum force and a trend towards increased stiffness.
Screw fixation in a synthetic bone model of pediatric lateral condyle fractures (Milch type II) provides increased biomechanical stability of the construct as compared with K-wires.
If similar effects were seen in vivo, increased biomechanical stability with screw fixation could decrease the occurrence of complications such as loss of reduction and nonunion.
对于采用螺钉或克氏针切开复位内固定治疗的儿童肱骨外髁骨折,已有良好预后的报道。尚无研究比较这两种固定方法的生物力学特性。我们假设螺钉固定在生物力学上比克氏针固定更稳定。
按照先前发表的方案,使用合成肱骨模型进行生物力学测试。用斜切锯制作斜形切口以模拟米尔奇II型骨折。骨折解剖复位后,用两根双皮质置入的0.062英寸发散克氏针或一枚斜行(垂直于骨折线)置入的4.0毫米拉力螺钉进行固定。然后将标本嵌入聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥中进行测试。采用位移控制进行力学测试,以0.5毫米/秒的速度从0至1.5毫米施加压缩或牵张,共10个循环。基于10个循环的平均最大力计算最大力。基于第10个循环的力-位移曲线斜率计算刚度。采用双样本t检验确定克氏针组和螺钉组在刚度和最大力方面的显著差异。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
与克氏针固定相比,螺钉固定在拉伸试验中的刚度和最大力显著更高。压缩试验显示最大力有统计学意义的增加以及刚度增加的趋势。
在儿童肱骨外髁骨折(米尔奇II型)的合成骨模型中,螺钉固定与克氏针相比可提高结构的生物力学稳定性。
如果在体内观察到类似效果,螺钉固定增加的生物力学稳定性可能会减少诸如复位丢失和骨不连等并发症的发生。