Suppr超能文献

筛查结肠镜检查诊断的结直肠癌患者的生存情况。

Survival in patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening colonoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Social Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul;82(1):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.048. Epub 2015 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Germany, screening colonoscopy was first established in 2002 as part of the national cancer screening program.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether colorectal cancer (CRC) survival differs when CRC is diagnosed by screening colonoscopy (S-CRC) versus diagnostic colonoscopy (D-CRC).

DESIGN

Long-term, retrospective, multicenter, observational study.

SETTING

Study centers: 10 private gastroenterology practices in Germany.

PATIENTS

A total of 60 patients diagnosed with CRC during screening colonoscopy and 252 patients during diagnostic colonoscopy in 2002, 2003, and 2004.

INTERVENTIONS

Colonoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Survival of patients up to December 2013.

RESULTS

Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) follow-up time was 81.0 (± 40.1) months. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stages I and II were found more often in S-CRC (81.6%) compared with D-CRC (59.9%; P < .002). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly reduced overall survival for patients with D-CRC (mean [± SD] 86.9 [± 3.0] months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 81.0-92.8) compared with S-CRC (mean [± SD] 107.1 [± 4.9] months; 95% CI, 97.4-116.9; P = .003). When deaths not related to CRC were excluded, survival was still shorter for D-CRC patients (mean [± SD] 89.4 [± 3.0] months; 95% CI, 83.5-95.4) compared with S-CRC (mean [± SD] 109.6 [± 4.7] months; 95% CI, 100.2-119.0; P = .004).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study design.

CONCLUSION

In this long-term, retrospective study, patients with CRC diagnosed during screening colonoscopy lived significantly longer when compared with patients with CRC diagnosed during diagnostic colonoscopy.

摘要

背景

德国于 2002 年将筛查结肠镜检查纳入国家癌症筛查计划,作为其一部分。

目的

评估通过筛查结肠镜检查(S-CRC)与诊断结肠镜检查(D-CRC)诊断结直肠癌(CRC)的患者,CRC 生存率是否存在差异。

设计

长期、回顾性、多中心、观察性研究。

地点

研究中心:德国的 10 家私人胃肠病学诊所。

患者

共纳入 2002 年、2003 年和 2004 年筛查结肠镜检查中诊断为 CRC 的 60 例患者和诊断结肠镜检查中诊断为 CRC 的 252 例患者。

干预措施

结肠镜检查。

主要观察指标

截至 2013 年 12 月患者的生存情况。

结果

平均(±标准差[SD])随访时间为 81.0(±40.1)个月。UICC 分期 I 和 II 期在 S-CRC 中更为常见(81.6%),而在 D-CRC 中则较少见(59.9%;P<.002)。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,D-CRC 患者的总生存率明显低于 S-CRC 患者(平均[±SD]86.9[±3.0]个月;95%置信区间[CI],81.0-92.8),与 S-CRC 患者(平均[±SD]107.1[±4.9]个月;95%CI,97.4-116.9;P=.003)。排除与 CRC 无关的死亡后,D-CRC 患者的生存时间仍较短(平均[±SD]89.4[±3.0]个月;95%CI,83.5-95.4),与 S-CRC 患者(平均[±SD]109.6[±4.7]个月;95%CI,100.2-119.0;P=.004)。

局限性

回顾性研究设计。

结论

在这项长期的回顾性研究中,与诊断结肠镜检查中诊断的 CRC 患者相比,筛查结肠镜检查中诊断的 CRC 患者的生存期明显更长。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验