Suppr超能文献

顽固性高血压:交感神经活动增强作为抗高血压治疗失败原因的证据

Refractory Hypertension: Evidence of Heightened Sympathetic Activity as a Cause of Antihypertensive Treatment Failure.

作者信息

Dudenbostel Tanja, Acelajado Maria C, Pisoni Roberto, Li Peng, Oparil Suzanne, Calhoun David A

机构信息

From the Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine (T.D., S.O., D.A.C.), Department of Biostatistics (P.L.), University of Alabama, Birmingham; Department of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile (M.C.A.); and Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (R.P.).

出版信息

Hypertension. 2015 Jul;66(1):126-33. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05449. Epub 2015 May 18.

Abstract

Refractory hypertension is an extreme phenotype of treatment failure defined as uncontrolled blood pressure in spite of ≥5 classes of antihypertensive agents, including chlorthalidone and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. A prospective evaluation of possible mechanisms of refractory hypertension has not been done. The goal of this study was to test for evidence of heightened sympathetic tone as indicated by 24-hour urinary normetanephrine levels, clinic and ambulatory heart rate (HR), HR variability, arterial stiffness as indexed by pulse wave velocity, and systemic vascular resistance compared with patients with controlled resistant hypertension. Forty-four consecutive patients, 15 with refractory and 29 with controlled resistant hypertension, were evaluated prospectively. Refractory hypertensive patients were younger (48±13.3 versus 56.5±14.1 years; P=0.038) and more likely women (80.0 versus 51.9%; P=0.047) compared with patients with controlled resistant hypertension. They also had higher urinary normetanephrine levels (464.4±250.2 versus 309.8±147.6 µg per 24 hours; P=0.03), higher clinic HR (77.8±7.7 versus 68.8±7.6 bpm; P=0.001) and 24-hour ambulatory HR (77.8±7.7 versus 68.8±7.6; P=0.0018), higher pulse wave velocity (11.8±2.2 versus 9.4±1.5 m/s; P=0.009), reduced HR variability (4.48 versus 6.11; P=0.03), and higher systemic vascular resistance (3795±1753 versus 2382±349 dyne·s·cm(5)·m(2); P=0.008). These findings are consistent with heightened sympathetic tone being a major contributor to antihypertensive treatment failure and highlight the need for effective sympatholytic therapies in patients with refractory hypertension.

摘要

顽固性高血压是治疗失败的一种极端表现型,定义为尽管使用了包括氯噻酮和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂在内的至少5类抗高血压药物,血压仍未得到控制。尚未对顽固性高血压可能的机制进行前瞻性评估。本研究的目的是与血压得到控制的难治性高血压患者相比,检测24小时尿去甲变肾上腺素水平、诊室和动态心率(HR)、HR变异性、以脉搏波速度为指标的动脉僵硬度以及全身血管阻力所表明的交感神经张力增强的证据。对44例连续患者进行了前瞻性评估,其中15例为顽固性高血压患者,29例为血压得到控制的难治性高血压患者。与血压得到控制的难治性高血压患者相比,顽固性高血压患者更年轻(48±13.3岁对56.5±14.1岁;P = 0.038),女性比例更高(80.0%对51.9%;P = 0.047)。他们的尿去甲变肾上腺素水平也更高(每24小时464.4±250.2对309.8±147.6μg;P = 0.03),诊室HR更高(77.8±7.7对68.8±7.6次/分钟;P = 0.001)和24小时动态HR更高(77.8±7.7对68.8±7.6;P = 0.0018),脉搏波速度更高(11.8±2.2对9.4±1.5米/秒;P = 0.009),HR变异性降低(4.48对6.11;P = 0.03),全身血管阻力更高(3795±1753对2382±349达因·秒·厘米⁻⁵·米⁻²;P = 0.008)。这些发现与交感神经张力增强是抗高血压治疗失败的主要原因一致,并突出了顽固性高血压患者有效抗交感神经治疗的必要性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Advances on the Experimental Research in Resistant Hypertension.抗高血压的实验研究进展。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):475-482. doi: 10.1007/s11906-024-01315-2. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
9
Sympathetic Neural Mechanisms in Hypertension: Recent Insights.高血压的交感神经机制:最新见解。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2023 Oct;25(10):263-270. doi: 10.1007/s11906-023-01254-4. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

2
Comment on optimal treatment for resistant hypertension: the missing data on pulse wave velocity.
Hypertension. 2014 Mar;63(3):e16. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02742. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验