Oostendorp Marlies, Lammerts van Bueren Jeroen J, Doshi Parul, Khan Imran, Ahmadi Tahamtan, Parren Paul W H I, van Solinge Wouter W, De Vooght Karen M K
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht.
Genmab, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Transfusion. 2015 Jun;55(6 Pt 2):1555-62. doi: 10.1111/trf.13150. Epub 2015 May 18.
Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) are increasingly integrated in the standard of care. The notion that therapeutic MoAbs can interfere with clinical laboratory tests is an emerging concern that requires immediate recognition and the development of appropriate solutions. Here, we describe that treatment of multiple myeloma patients with daratumumab, a novel anti-CD38 MoAb, resulted in false-positive indirect antiglobulin tests (IATs) for all patients for 2 to 6 months after infusion. This precluded the correct identification of irregular blood group antibodies for patients requiring blood transfusion.
The IAT was performed using three- and 11-donor-cell panels. Interference of daratumumab and three other anti-CD38 MoAbs was studied using fresh-frozen plasma spiked with different MoAb concentrations. Additionally it was tested whether two potentially neutralizing agents, anti-idiotype antibody and recombinant soluble CD38 (sCD38) extracellular domain, were able to inhibit the interference.
The CD38 MoAbs caused agglutination in the IAT in a dose-dependent manner. Addition of an excess of anti-idiotype antibodies or sCD38 protein to the test abrogated CD38 MoAb interference and successfully restored irregular antibody screening and identification.
CD38 MoAb therapy causes false-positive results in the IAT. The reliability of the test could be restored by adding a neutralizing agent against the CD38 MoAb to the patient's plasma. This study emphasizes that during drug development, targeted therapeutics should be investigated for potential interference with laboratory tests. Clinical laboratories should be informed when patients receive MoAb treatments and matched laboratory tests to prevent interference should be employed.
单克隆抗体(MoAbs)越来越多地被纳入标准治疗方案。治疗性单克隆抗体可能干扰临床实验室检测这一观念正成为一个新的关注点,需要立即引起重视并制定合适的解决方案。在此,我们描述了用新型抗CD38单克隆抗体达雷妥尤单抗治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者后,所有患者在输注后2至6个月内间接抗球蛋白试验(IAT)出现假阳性。这妨碍了对需要输血患者不规则血型抗体的正确鉴定。
使用三供体细胞板和11供体细胞板进行间接抗球蛋白试验。用添加不同单克隆抗体浓度的新鲜冷冻血浆研究达雷妥尤单抗和其他三种抗CD38单克隆抗体的干扰情况。此外,还测试了两种潜在的中和剂,抗独特型抗体和重组可溶性CD38(sCD38)胞外结构域,是否能够抑制干扰。
CD38单克隆抗体在间接抗球蛋白试验中引起剂量依赖性凝集。在试验中加入过量的抗独特型抗体或sCD38蛋白可消除CD38单克隆抗体的干扰,并成功恢复不规则抗体筛查和鉴定。
CD38单克隆抗体治疗会导致间接抗球蛋白试验出现假阳性结果。通过向患者血浆中添加针对CD38单克隆抗体的中和剂可恢复检测的可靠性。本研究强调,在药物研发过程中,应研究靶向治疗药物对实验室检测的潜在干扰。当患者接受单克隆抗体治疗时,临床实验室应被告知,并应采用相应的实验室检测以防止干扰。