Melnick Alexis P, Murphy Erin M, Masbou Alexis K, Sapra Katherine J, Rosenwaks Zev, Spandorfer Steven D
Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):104-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 16.
To determine whether endometrial biopsy timing affects implantation rates and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous endometrial coculture (AECC).
Retrospective cohort study.
Academic medical center.
PATIENT(S): All patients with a history of at least one failed IVF cycle who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle at our center from May 2004 to November 2013 were included.
INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent luteal-phase endometrial biopsy in preparation for IVF. Biopsy samples were used for IVF in either the subsequent menstrual cycle or a future cycle. Embryos were cultured in AECC media and transferred on day 3.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A total of 2,533 cycles of 1,719 patients who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle were identified. Cycles were stratified by endometrial biopsy timing. Clinical outcomes, including implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates, were analyzed and compared between the two groups.
RESULT(S): A total of 1,416 coculture biopsies were performed in the menstrual cycle before IVF and 1,117 were performed more than one cycle before IVF. The two groups were similar in age, body mass index, number of mature oocytes retrieved, and best embryo grade. There were no significant differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates, with adjusted relative risks of 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.13), 1.02 (95% CI 0.91-1.14), and 0.99 (95% CI 0.86-1.16), respectively.
CONCLUSION(S): Coculture biopsy in the cycle preceding IVF does not increase implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates compared with biopsies performed more than one cycle before IVF. Previously demonstrated improvements in embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing IVF with AECC are probably not attributable to biopsy-induced endometrial injury.
确定在接受体外受精(IVF)联合自体子宫内膜共培养(AECC)的患者中,子宫内膜活检时机是否会影响着床率和妊娠结局。
回顾性队列研究。
学术医疗中心。
纳入2004年5月至2013年11月在本中心接受IVF-AECC周期治疗且有至少一次IVF周期失败史的所有患者。
患者在黄体期进行子宫内膜活检以准备IVF。活检样本用于后续月经周期或未来周期的IVF。胚胎在AECC培养基中培养并在第3天进行移植。
共识别出1719例接受IVF-AECC周期治疗的患者的2533个周期。周期按子宫内膜活检时机分层。分析并比较两组的临床结局,包括着床率、妊娠率和活产率。
IVF前月经周期共进行了1416次共培养活检,IVF前一个周期以上进行了1117次共培养活检。两组在年龄、体重指数、回收的成熟卵母细胞数量和最佳胚胎等级方面相似。着床率、临床妊娠率或活产率无显著差异,调整后的相对风险分别为1.02(95%置信区间[CI]0.92-1.13)、1.02(95%CI 0.91-1.14)和0.99(95%CI 0.86-1.16)。
与IVF前一个周期以上进行活检相比,IVF前周期的共培养活检不会提高着床率、临床妊娠率或活产率。先前证明的接受IVF联合AECC治疗的患者胚胎质量和妊娠结局的改善可能不归因于活检引起的子宫内膜损伤。