• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Randomized Controlled Trial of Autologous Endometrial Coculture Versus Traditional in Vitro Fertilization.

作者信息

Van Heertum Kristin, Somkuti Stephen, Nichols Jennifer, Schinfeld Jay, Sobel Michael, Barmat Larry

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 2017 May-Jun;62(5-6):329-32.

PMID:30028098
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if autologous endometrial cell coculture improves embryo development and clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF) (control, n=73) or autologous endometrial cell coculture (AECC) (n=61). All patients underwent endometrial biopsy on cycle day 5–10 post luteinizing hormone surge. A total of 129 patients underwent embryo transfer (69 control, 60 AECC). Clinical outcomes as well as embryonic quality measures were then compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean age, day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone, number of oocytes collected, and clinical outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Embryo development was overall similar, with the exception that embryonic grade was significantly better with AECC than with control: 1.5 (0.04) vs. 2.6 (0.03), p<0.0001. There was no difference in implantation, live birth or multiple gestation rates. CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest prospective randomized controlled trials of AECC versus traditional IVF. There was significant improvement in embryo morphology in the coculture group, although clinical outcomes were similar between the groups. Further studies are necessary to achieve enough power to fully delineate the effects of coculture on IVF outcome.

摘要

相似文献

1
Randomized Controlled Trial of Autologous Endometrial Coculture Versus Traditional in Vitro Fertilization.
J Reprod Med. 2017 May-Jun;62(5-6):329-32.
2
Autologous endometrial coculture biopsy: is timing everything?自体子宫内膜共培养活检:时机决定一切?
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):104-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 16.
3
Autologous endometrial coculture in patients with IVF failure: outcome of the first 1,030 cases.
J Reprod Med. 2004 Jun;49(6):463-7.
4
Autologous endometrial cell co-culture improves human embryo development to high-quality blastocysts: a randomized controlled trial.自体子宫内膜细胞共培养提高人类胚胎发育至高质量囊胚:一项随机对照试验。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Mar;38(3):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.039. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
5
Histologic characteristics of the endometrium predicts success when utilizing autologous endometrial coculture in patients with IVF failure.子宫内膜的组织学特征可预测体外受精失败患者采用自体子宫内膜共培养时的成功率。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006 Apr;23(4):185-9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9034-4.
6
Increased pregnancy rate using standardized coculture on autologous endometrial cells and single blastocyst transfer : a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2015 Dec 24;61(8):79-88.
7
Embryo transfer after autologous endometrial coculture improves pregnancy rates.
Hum Cell. 2001 Jun;14(2):135-40.
8
Importance of the biopsy date in autologous endometrial cocultures for patients with multiple implantation failures.活检日期在多次植入失败患者自体子宫内膜共培养中的重要性。
Fertil Steril. 2002 Jun;77(6):1209-13. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03134-5.
9
Coculture of human embryos with autologous human endometrial epithelial cells in patients with implantation failure.植入失败患者中人类胚胎与自体人子宫内膜上皮细胞的共培养。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Aug;84(8):2638-46. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.8.5873.
10
Autologous endometrial co-culture in patients with repeated failures of implantation after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.体外受精-胚胎移植后反复种植失败患者的自体子宫内膜共培养
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999 Mar;16(3):121-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1022575630105.