Cavalli Andrea, Vendruscolo Michele
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK.
Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB), 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
J Biomol NMR. 2015 Aug;62(4):503-9. doi: 10.1007/s10858-015-9940-9. Epub 2015 May 20.
We present an analysis of the results obtained at CASD-NMR round 3 by the CHESHIRE and the YAPP methods. To determine protein structures, the CHESHIRE method uses solely information provided by NMR chemical shifts, while the YAPP method uses an automated assignment of NOESY spectra. Of the ten targets of CASD-NMR round 3, nine CHESHIRE predictions and eight YAPP ones were submitted. The eight YAPP predictions ranged from 0.7 to 1.9 Å Cα accuracy, with an average of 1.3 Å. The nine CHESHIRE predictions ranged from 0.8 to 2.6 Å Cα accuracy for the ordered regions of the proteins, with an average of 1.6 Å. Taken together, these results illustrate how the NOESY based YAPP method and the chemical shift based CHESHIRE method can provide structures of comparable quality.
我们展示了通过CHESHIRE和YAPP方法在CASD-NMR第三轮中获得的结果分析。为确定蛋白质结构,CHESHIRE方法仅使用NMR化学位移提供的信息,而YAPP方法使用NOESY谱的自动归属。在CASD-NMR第三轮的十个目标中,提交了九个CHESHIRE预测结果和八个YAPP预测结果。八个YAPP预测的Cα精度范围为0.7至1.9 Å,平均为1.3 Å。九个CHESHIRE预测的蛋白质有序区域的Cα精度范围为0.8至2.6 Å,平均为1.6 Å。总体而言,这些结果说明了基于NOESY的YAPP方法和基于化学位移的CHESHIRE方法如何能够提供质量相当的结构。