Suppr超能文献

CHESHIRE和YAPP方法在CASD-NMR第三轮中的性能分析。

Analysis of the performance of the CHESHIRE and YAPP methods at CASD-NMR round 3.

作者信息

Cavalli Andrea, Vendruscolo Michele

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK.

Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB), 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Biomol NMR. 2015 Aug;62(4):503-9. doi: 10.1007/s10858-015-9940-9. Epub 2015 May 20.

Abstract

We present an analysis of the results obtained at CASD-NMR round 3 by the CHESHIRE and the YAPP methods. To determine protein structures, the CHESHIRE method uses solely information provided by NMR chemical shifts, while the YAPP method uses an automated assignment of NOESY spectra. Of the ten targets of CASD-NMR round 3, nine CHESHIRE predictions and eight YAPP ones were submitted. The eight YAPP predictions ranged from 0.7 to 1.9 Å Cα accuracy, with an average of 1.3 Å. The nine CHESHIRE predictions ranged from 0.8 to 2.6 Å Cα accuracy for the ordered regions of the proteins, with an average of 1.6 Å. Taken together, these results illustrate how the NOESY based YAPP method and the chemical shift based CHESHIRE method can provide structures of comparable quality.

摘要

我们展示了通过CHESHIRE和YAPP方法在CASD-NMR第三轮中获得的结果分析。为确定蛋白质结构,CHESHIRE方法仅使用NMR化学位移提供的信息,而YAPP方法使用NOESY谱的自动归属。在CASD-NMR第三轮的十个目标中,提交了九个CHESHIRE预测结果和八个YAPP预测结果。八个YAPP预测的Cα精度范围为0.7至1.9 Å,平均为1.3 Å。九个CHESHIRE预测的蛋白质有序区域的Cα精度范围为0.8至2.6 Å,平均为1.6 Å。总体而言,这些结果说明了基于NOESY的YAPP方法和基于化学位移的CHESHIRE方法如何能够提供质量相当的结构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验