• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术中TriGuard™ HDH栓塞偏折装置的前瞻性随机评估:DEFLECT III试验结果

A prospective randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH embolic DEFLECTion device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the DEFLECT III trial.

作者信息

Lansky Alexandra J, Schofer Joachim, Tchetche Didier, Stella Pieter, Pietras Cody G, Parise Helen, Abrams Kevin, Forrest John K, Cleman Michael, Reinöhl Jochen, Cuisset Thomas, Blackman Daniel, Bolotin Gil, Spitzer Stefan, Kappert Utz, Gilard Martine, Modine Thomas, Hildick-Smith David, Haude Michael, Margolis Pauliina, Brickman Adam M, Voros Szilard, Baumbach Andreas

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA Yale Cardiovascular Research Group, New Haven, CT, USA

Cardiovascular Center, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2015 Aug 14;36(31):2070-2078. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv191. Epub 2015 May 19.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv191
PMID:25990342
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and performance of the TriGuard™ HDH Embolic Deflection Device (TriGuard) compared with no cerebral protection in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

From February 2014 to March 2015, 85 subjects undergoing TAVI at 13 centres in Europe and Israel were randomized to TriGuard protection vs. no protection. Subjects underwent neurologic and cognitive evaluation at baseline, pre-discharge and 30 days; cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 4 ± 2 days post-procedure and at 30 days. Technical success, which included complete 3-vessel cerebral coverage, was achieved in 88.9% (40/45) of cases. The primary in-hospital procedural safety endpoint (death, stroke, life-threatening or disabling bleeding, stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, or major vascular complications) occurred in 21.7% of TriGuard and 30.8% of control subjects (P = 0.34). In the Per Treatment population (subjects with complete three-vessel cerebral coverage), TriGuard use was associated with greater freedom from new ischaemic brain lesions (26.9 vs. 11.5%), fewer new neurologic deficits detected by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (3.1 vs. 15.4%), improved Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, better performance on a delayed memory task (P = 0.028) at discharge, and a >2-fold increase in recovery of normal cognitive function (MoCA score >26) at 30 days.

CONCLUSION

TriGuard cerebral protection during TAVI is safe and complete cerebral vessel coverage was achieved in 89% of subjects. In this exploratory study, subjects undergoing protected TAVI had more freedom from ischaemic brain lesions, fewer neurologic deficits, and improved cognitive function in some domains at discharge and 30 days compared with controls.

摘要

目的

评估与未进行脑保护相比,TriGuard™ HDH栓塞偏转装置(TriGuard)在接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者中的安全性、有效性和性能。

方法与结果

2014年2月至2015年3月,欧洲和以色列13个中心的85例接受TAVI的受试者被随机分为TriGuard保护组和无保护组。受试者在基线、出院前和30天时接受神经和认知评估;术后4±2天和30天时进行脑扩散加权磁共振成像。技术成功(包括完全覆盖三支脑血管)在88.9%(40/45)的病例中实现。主要的院内手术安全终点(死亡、中风、危及生命或致残性出血、2期或3期急性肾损伤或主要血管并发症)在21.7%的TriGuard组和30.8%的对照组受试者中发生(P = 0.34)。在每治疗人群(完全覆盖三支脑血管的受试者)中,使用TriGuard与新发缺血性脑病变的发生率更低(26.9%对11.5%)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表检测到的新神经功能缺损更少(3.1%对15.4%)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分改善、出院时延迟记忆任务表现更好(P = 0.028)以及30天时正常认知功能恢复(MoCA评分>26)增加2倍以上相关。

结论

TAVI期间的TriGuard脑保护是安全的,89%的受试者实现了完全的脑血管覆盖。在此探索性研究中,与对照组相比,接受保护性TAVI的受试者在出院时和30天时新发缺血性脑病变的发生率更低、神经功能缺损更少,并且在某些领域的认知功能有所改善。

相似文献

1
A prospective randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH embolic DEFLECTion device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the DEFLECT III trial.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中TriGuard™ HDH栓塞偏折装置的前瞻性随机评估:DEFLECT III试验结果
Eur Heart J. 2015 Aug 14;36(31):2070-2078. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv191. Epub 2015 May 19.
2
Safety and performance of a novel embolic deflection device in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the DEFLECT I study.新型栓塞转向装置在经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的安全性和性能:来自 DEFLECT I 研究的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2015 May;11(1):75-84. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M04_01.
3
A randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH cerebral embolic protection device to Reduce the Impact of Cerebral Embolic LEsions after TransCatheter Aortic Valve ImplanTation: the REFLECT I trial.TriGuard™ HDH 脑保护装置降低经导管主动脉瓣植入术后脑栓塞病变影响的随机评估:REFLECT I 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 15;42(27):2670-2679. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab213.
4
Embolic protection in patients undergoing transaortic transcatheter aortic valve replacement: initial experience with the TriGuard HDH embolic deflection device.经主动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的栓塞保护:TriGuard HDH栓塞偏转装置的初步经验。
J Card Surg. 2016 Oct;31(10):617-622. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12822. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
5
Effect of a Cerebral Protection Device on Brain Lesions Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The CLEAN-TAVI Randomized Clinical Trial.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中脑保护装置对脑损伤的影响:CLEAN-TAVI 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 9;316(6):592-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10302.
6
Exploring the Difference in Post-procedural Stroke Rates Between Patients with Aortic Stenosis Who Undergo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.探索接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者术后中风发生率的差异。
Cureus. 2018 Apr 17;10(4):e2494. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2494.
7
Randomized Evaluation of TriGuard 3 Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: REFLECT II.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用 TriGuard 3 脑保护装置的随机评估:REFLECT II 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 8;14(5):515-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.011. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
First-in-man experience with a new embolic deflection device in transcatheter aortic valve interventions.经导管主动脉瓣介入治疗中新型栓塞转向装置的首例人体应用经验。
EuroIntervention. 2012 May 15;8(1):51-6. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I1A9.
9
Clinical Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Brain MRI Lesions After TAVR: Results of a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后扩散加权脑 MRI 病变的临床意义:一项患者水平汇总分析的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Aug 20;84(8):712-722. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.055.
10
Neurologic Complications of Unprotected Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Neuro-TAVI Trial).无保护经导管主动脉瓣植入术的神经系统并发症(来自Neuro-TAVI试验)
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;118(10):1519-1526. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的常规脑栓塞保护:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2025 Aug 6;9(5):100651. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100651. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Efficacy and Safety of ACURATE neo2 in Valve-in-Valve TAVI: A Prospective Single-Center Study.ACURATE neo2在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)中瓣中瓣植入的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 2;14(13):4677. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134677.
3
Cerebral embolic protection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a pooled analysis of 4091 patients.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)中的脑栓塞保护:4091例患者的汇总分析
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01128-3.
4
Preventing cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing TAVR: the current and future landscape.预防经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者的脑血管事件:现状与未来展望
Future Cardiol. 2025 May;21(6):335-337. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2484961. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Replacement: The Latest Advances and Prospects.经导管主动脉瓣植入与置换:最新进展与前景
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 9;14(6):1844. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061844.
6
Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的脑栓塞保护装置:采用序贯试验分析的荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr;14(7):e038869. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038869. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
7
Neuroprotection Devices in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories: Does It Sufficiently Protect Our Patients?心脏导管实验室中的神经保护装置:它是否能充分保护我们的患者?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 10;61(2):305. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020305.
8
The Impact of Aortic Arch Morphology on Periprocedural Stroke in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉弓形态对经导管主动脉瓣置换术中围手术期卒中的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 7;14(4):1045. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041045.
9
2024 Update on Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后脑栓塞保护的2024年更新
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 28;13(23):7256. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237256.
10
Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices: Current State of the Art.脑栓塞保护装置:当前技术水平
US Cardiol. 2023 Mar 31;17:e02. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.12. eCollection 2023.