• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国学术医疗中心预防压疮质量改进干预措施的比较效果

Comparative effectiveness of quality improvement interventions for pressure ulcer prevention in academic medical centers in the United States.

作者信息

Padula William V, Makic Mary Beth F, Mishra Manish K, Campbell Jonathan D, Nair Kavita V, Wald Heidi L, Valuck Robert J

机构信息

Section of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Jun;41(6):246-56. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41034-7.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41034-7
PMID:25990890
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prevention of pressure ulcers, one of the hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) targeted by the 2008 nonpayment policy of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), is a critical issue. This study was conducted to determine the comparative effectiveness of quality improvement (QI) interventions associated with reduced hospital-acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU) rates.

METHODS

In an quasi-experimental design, interrupted time series analyses were conducted to determine the correlation between HAPU incidence rates and adoption of QI interventions. Among University HealthSystem Consortium hospitals, 55 academic medical centers were surveyed from September 2007 through February 2012 for adoption patterns of QI interventions for pressure ulcer prevention, and hospital-level data for 5,208 pressure ulcer cases were analyzed. Between- and within-hospital reduction significance was tested with t-tests post-CMS policy intervention.

RESULTS

Fifty-three (96%) of the 55 hospitals used QI interventions for pressure ulcer prevention. The effect size analysis identified five effective interventions that each reduced pressure ulcer rates by greater than 1 case per 1,000 patient discharges per quarter: leadership initiatives, visual tools, pressure ulcer staging, skin care, and patient nutrition. The greatest reductions in rates occurred earlier in the adoption process (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Five QI interventions had clinically meaningful associations with reduced stage III and IV HAPU incidence rates in 55 academic medical centers. These QI interventions can be used in support of an evidence-based prevention protocol for pressure ulcers. Hospitals can not only use these findings from this study as part of a QI bundle for preventing HAPUs.

摘要

背景

压疮预防是医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)2008年不支付政策所针对的医院获得性疾病(HACs)之一,是一个关键问题。本研究旨在确定与降低医院获得性压疮(HAPU)发生率相关的质量改进(QI)干预措施的比较效果。

方法

采用准实验设计,进行中断时间序列分析,以确定HAPU发生率与采用QI干预措施之间的相关性。在大学卫生系统联盟的医院中,于2007年9月至2012年2月对55家学术医疗中心进行了调查,以了解预防压疮的QI干预措施的采用模式,并分析了5208例压疮病例的医院层面数据。在CMS政策干预后,采用t检验对医院间和医院内的降低显著性进行了测试。

结果

55家医院中有53家(96%)采用了QI干预措施来预防压疮。效应量分析确定了五种有效的干预措施,每种措施每季度每1000例患者出院时压疮发生率降低超过1例:领导倡议、视觉工具、压疮分期、皮肤护理和患者营养。在采用过程的早期,发生率下降幅度最大(p<0.05)。

结论

在55家学术医疗中心,五种QI干预措施与降低III期和IV期HAPU发生率具有临床意义上的关联。这些QI干预措施可用于支持基于证据的压疮预防方案。医院不仅可以将本研究的这些发现用作预防HAPU的QI组合的一部分。

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of quality improvement interventions for pressure ulcer prevention in academic medical centers in the United States.美国学术医疗中心预防压疮质量改进干预措施的比较效果
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Jun;41(6):246-56. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41034-7.
2
Are Evidence-based Practices Associated With Effective Prevention of Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers in US Academic Medical Centers?在美国学术医疗中心,循证实践与有效预防医院获得性压疮有关联吗?
Med Care. 2016 May;54(5):512-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000516.
3
Increased Adoption of Quality Improvement Interventions to Implement Evidence-Based Practices for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in U.S. Academic Medical Centers.美国学术医疗中心增加采用质量改进干预措施以实施基于证据的压疮预防实践。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Dec;12(6):328-36. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12108. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
4
Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers at Academic Medical Centers in the United States, 2008-2012: Tracking Changes Since the CMS Nonpayment Policy.2008 - 2012年美国学术医疗中心的医院获得性压疮:追踪自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)不支付政策实施以来的变化
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Jun;41(6):257-63. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41035-9.
5
Hospital-acquired pressure ulcer prevalence--evaluating low-air-loss beds.医院获得性压疮发生率——评估低气流损失床。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Jan-Feb;38(1):55-60. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e318202e4bf.
6
Factors Influencing Adoption of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcer Prevention Programs in US Academic Medical Centers.影响美国学术医疗中心采用医院获得性压疮预防项目的因素。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;42(4):327-30. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000145.
7
Identifying gaps, barriers, and solutions in implementing pressure ulcer prevention programs.识别实施压疮预防项目中的差距、障碍和解决方案。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Jun;37(6):253-64. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37033-x.
8
A framework of quality improvement interventions to implement evidence-based practices for pressure ulcer prevention.一个用于实施基于证据的压疮预防实践的质量改进干预框架。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014 Jun;27(6):280-4; quiz 285-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000450703.87099.5b.
9
Using clinical data to predict high-cost performance coding issues associated with pressure ulcers: a multilevel cohort model.利用临床数据预测与压疮相关的高成本绩效编码问题:一种多层次队列模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e95-e102. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw118.
10
Pressure ulcer prevention program: a journey.压力性溃疡预防计划:一段旅程。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;38(5):505-13. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e31822ad2ab.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is the Impact of Care Bundles on the Prevalence or Incidence of Pressure Ulcers Among At-Risk Adults in the Acute Care Setting? A Systematic Review.护理集束对急症护理环境中高危成年人压疮患病率或发病率的影响是什么?一项系统评价。
Int Wound J. 2025 Jun;22(6):e70693. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70693.
2
Application of bundled process control in the prevention of pressure injury in patients with head and neck cancer.捆绑式流程控制在头颈部癌症患者压疮预防中的应用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0305190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305190. eCollection 2024.
3
Quality improvement tools to manage deceased organ donation processes: a scoping review.
质量改进工具在管理器官捐献流程中的应用:一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 2;13(2):e070333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070333.
4
Provider perspectives of community-acquired pressure injury prevention in veterans with spinal cord injury.提供者对脊髓损伤退伍军人获得性压疮预防的看法。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Jan;47(1):168-180. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2088505. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
Quantitative iTRAQ LC-MS/MS reveals muscular proteome profiles of deep pressure ulcers.定量 iTRAQ LC-MS/MS 揭示深部压疮的肌肉蛋白质组图谱。
Biosci Rep. 2020 Jun 26;40(6). doi: 10.1042/BSR20200563.
6
Prevalence of Pressure Injuries Nationwide from 2009 to 2015: Results from the National Inpatient Sample Database in Korea.2009 年至 2015 年全国压力性损伤的流行情况:来自韩国全国住院患者样本数据库的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 27;16(5):704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050704.
7
Measuring the quality of pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic mapping review of quality indicators.测量压疮预防质量:质量指标的系统制图综述。
Int Wound J. 2018 Apr;15(2):218-224. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12854. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
8
Effectiveness and Value of Prophylactic 5-Layer Foam Sacral Dressings to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Acute Care Hospitals: An Observational Cohort Study.预防性5层泡沫骶部敷料预防急性护理医院中获得性压力损伤的有效性和价值:一项观察性队列研究。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Sep/Oct;44(5):413-419. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000358.
9
Using clinical data to predict high-cost performance coding issues associated with pressure ulcers: a multilevel cohort model.利用临床数据预测与压疮相关的高成本绩效编码问题:一种多层次队列模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e95-e102. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw118.