Suppr超能文献

单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的三方比较:一项多中心试验

Tripartite comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: A multicenter trial.

作者信息

He Guo-Lin, Jiang Ze-Sheng, Cheng Yuan, Lai Qing-Bo, Zhou Chen-Jie, Liu Hai-Yan, Gao Yi, Pan Ming-Xin, Jian Zhi-Xiang

机构信息

Guo-Lin He, Ze-Sheng Jiang, Yuan Cheng, Chen-Jie Zhou, Hai-Yan Liu, Yi Gao, Ming-Xin Pan, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May 16;7(5):540-6. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.540.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the characteristics of two single-incision methods, and conventional laparoscopy in cholecystectomy, and demonstrate the safety and feasibility.

METHODS

Three hundred patients with gallstones or gallbladder polyps were admitted to two clinical centers from January 2013 to January 2014 and were randomized into three groups of 100: single-incision three-device group, X-Cone group, and conventional group. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, postoperative pain, cosmetic score, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs were compared, with a follow-up duration of 1 mo.

RESULTS

A total of 142 males (47%) and 158 females (53%) were enrolled in this study. The population characteristics of these three groups is no significant differences exist in terms of age, sex, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiology (P > 0.05). In results, there were no significant differences in blood loss, length of hospitalization, postoperative complications.The operative time in X-Cone group was significantly longer than other groups.There were significant differences in postoperative pain scores and cosmetic scores at diffent times after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that this two single-incision methods are safe and feasible. Both methods are superior to the conventional procedure in cosmetic and pain scores.

摘要

目的

比较两种单切口方法及传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的特点,证明其安全性和可行性。

方法

2013年1月至2014年1月,300例胆结石或胆囊息肉患者被收治于两个临床中心,并随机分为三组,每组100例:单切口三器械组、X-Cone组和传统组。比较手术时间、术中出血量、并发症、术后疼痛、美容评分、住院时间和住院费用,随访1个月。

结果

本研究共纳入142例男性(47%)和158例女性(53%)。三组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会分级等人口学特征无显著差异(P>0.05)。结果显示,三组患者的出血量、住院时间、术后并发症无显著差异。X-Cone组的手术时间显著长于其他组。术后不同时间的疼痛评分和美容评分存在显著差异(P<0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,这两种单切口方法安全可行。两种方法在美容和疼痛评分方面均优于传统手术。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Laparoscopic entry techniques.腹腔镜进入技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1(1):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub5.

本文引用的文献

6
Review of 100 cases of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.100例单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术回顾
J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Mar;82(3):179-84. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.179. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验