Espinosa Mario, Hernàndez Jesùs, Arenas Maria Dolores, Carnicer Fernando, Caramelo Carlos, Fabrizi Fabrizio
Division of Nephrology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2015;40(3):258-65. doi: 10.1159/000368501. Epub 2015 May 14.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatitis C virus infection remains prevalent among patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis and has a detrimental impact on survival in this population. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients is still a challenge to clinicians. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapy with pegylated interferon, alone or combined with ribavirin, for chronic hepatitis C among patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis.
We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort trial with monotherapy (pegylated interferon) (n=21) or combined antiviral therapy (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) (n=5) for chronic hepatitis C in patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis.
Sustained virological response was obtained in eleven (42%) patients. Seven (26.9%) patients interrupted prematurely the antiviral treatment due to serious side-effects, the most frequent cause of treatment withdrawal being hematological (n=3). HCV RNA load was lower in responder than non-responder patients, 5.44 (3.45; 6.36) vs. 5.86 (4.61; 6.46) log10 copies/mL, even if the difference was not significant (P=0.099). Blood transfusion requirement was greater in patients on combined antiviral therapy than those on pegylated interferon alone, 100% (5/5) vs. 0% (0/21), P=0.0001. No difference in sustained viral response occurred between patients on combined antiviral therapy and those on pegylated interferon monotherapy [40% (2/5) vs. 42.8% (9/21), P=0.90].
Results from this study showed that pegylated interferon alone or with ribavirin is unsatisfactory in terms of efficacy and safety. Prospective trials based on interferon-free regimens (i.e., sofosbuvir plus ribavirin or sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir) are under way in patients with hepatitis C receiving long-term hemodialysis.
背景/目的:丙型肝炎病毒感染在长期血液透析患者中仍然普遍存在,并且对该人群的生存有不利影响。血液透析患者慢性丙型肝炎的抗病毒治疗对临床医生来说仍然是一项挑战。本研究的目的是评估聚乙二醇化干扰素单独或联合利巴韦林治疗长期血液透析患者慢性丙型肝炎的疗效和安全性。
我们进行了一项回顾性多中心队列试验,对长期血液透析患者的慢性丙型肝炎采用单药治疗(聚乙二醇化干扰素)(n = 21)或联合抗病毒治疗(聚乙二醇化干扰素加利巴韦林)(n = 5)。
11名(42%)患者获得了持续病毒学应答。7名(26.9%)患者因严重副作用而提前中断抗病毒治疗,治疗中断的最常见原因是血液学方面的(n = 3)。应答者的HCV RNA载量低于无应答者,分别为5.44(3.45;6.36)对5.86(4.61;6.46)log10拷贝/毫升,尽管差异不显著(P = 0.099)。联合抗病毒治疗的患者输血需求高于单独使用聚乙二醇化干扰素的患者,分别为100%(5/5)对0%(0/21),P = 0.0001。联合抗病毒治疗的患者与聚乙二醇化干扰素单药治疗的患者在持续病毒应答方面没有差异[40%(2/5)对42.8%(9/21),P = 0.90]。
本研究结果表明,聚乙二醇化干扰素单独使用或与利巴韦林联合使用在疗效和安全性方面都不尽人意。基于无干扰素方案(即索磷布韦加利巴韦林或索磷布韦加达卡他韦)的前瞻性试验正在接受长期血液透析的丙型肝炎患者中进行。