Leffler Christopher T, Vaziri Kamyar, Cavuoto Kara M, McKeown Craig A, Schwartz Stephen G, Kishor Krishna S, Pariyadath Allison
Department of Ophthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;160(2):385-390.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 19.
To determine the association of strabismus surgery reoperation rates with adjustable or conventional sutures.
Retrospective cross-sectional study.
setting: Review of a large national private insurance database.
Adults aged 18-89 having strabismus surgery between 2007 and 2011.
Adjustable vs conventional suture strabismus surgery.
Reoperation rate in the first postoperative year.
Overall, 526 of 6178 surgical patients had a reoperation (8.5%). Reoperations were performed after 8.1% of adjustable suture surgeries and after 8.6% of conventional suture surgeries (P = .57). Of the 4357 horizontal muscle surgeries, reoperations were performed after 5.8% of adjustable suture surgeries, and after 7.8% of conventional suture surgeries (P = .02). Of the 1072 vertical muscle surgeries, reoperations were performed after 15.2% of adjustable suture surgeries and after 10.4% of conventional suture surgeries (P = .05). Younger age (18-39 years) was associated with a lower reoperation rate (P ≤ .02). The significant multivariable predictors of reoperation for horizontal surgery were adjustable sutures (odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.91), monocular deviation (OR 0.64), complex surgery (OR 1.63), and unilateral surgery on 2 horizontal muscles (OR 0.70, all P ≤ .01). Adjustable sutures were not significantly associated with reoperation rates after vertical muscle surgery (multivariable OR 1.45, P = .07).
Adjustable sutures were associated with significantly fewer reoperations for horizontal muscle surgery. Adjustable sutures tended to be associated with more reoperations for vertical muscle surgery, but this observation was not statistically significant in the primary analysis after controlling for age.
确定斜视手术再次手术率与可调节缝线或传统缝线之间的关联。
回顾性横断面研究。
研究背景:对一个大型全国性商业保险数据库进行回顾。
2007年至2011年间接受斜视手术的18至89岁成年人。
可调节缝线与传统缝线斜视手术。
术后第一年的再次手术率。
总体而言,6178例手术患者中有526例进行了再次手术(8.5%)。可调节缝线手术后再次手术率为8.1%,传统缝线手术后为8.6%(P = 0.57)。在4357例水平肌手术中,可调节缝线手术后再次手术率为5.8%,传统缝线手术后为7.8%(P = 0.02)。在1072例垂直肌手术中,可调节缝线手术后再次手术率为15.2%,传统缝线手术后为10.4%(P = 0.05)。年龄较小(18至39岁)与较低的再次手术率相关(P≤0.02)。水平手术再次手术的显著多变量预测因素为可调节缝线(优势比[OR]0.69,95%置信区间0.52 - 0.91)、单眼偏斜(OR 0.64)、复杂手术(OR 1.63)以及双侧水平肌单侧手术(OR 0.70,均P≤0.01)。可调节缝线与垂直肌手术后再次手术率无显著关联(多变量OR 1.45,P = 0.07)。
可调节缝线与水平肌手术再次手术显著减少相关。可调节缝线在垂直肌手术中倾向于与更多再次手术相关,但在控制年龄后的初步分析中,这一观察结果无统计学意义。