Suppr超能文献

阑尾炎的报告术语是否需要标准化?

Is there a need to standardize reporting terminology in appendicitis?

作者信息

Godwin Benjamin David, Simianu Vlad Valentin, Drake Frederick Thurston, Dighe Manjiri, Flum David, Bhargava Puneet

机构信息

Departments of *Radiology and †Surgery, University of Washington; and ‡Department of Radiology, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Ultrasound Q. 2015 Jun;31(2):92-4. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000123.

Abstract

While computed tomography (CT) remains the most accurate and widely used modality for appendicitis imaging, ultrasound has developed its own niche role, especially in the pediatric population and in premenopausal women. Ultrasound is commonly used as the initial imaging test when available, with indeterminate or clinically equivocal cases proceeding to CT.To avoid the radiation and time and cost of CT, ultrasound needs to be improved. While previous studies have focused on improving the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound through better patient selection and technique, relatively little attention has been brought to the ultrasound report, which often serves as the sole mode of communication between the radiologist and the clinician.Standardization of reporting and terminology has been found to improve patient outcomes and management in breast imaging. A standardized report for appendicitis has the potential to decrease confusion and increase accuracy. A potential format could include a standardized list of the presence or absence of imaging findings associated with appendicitis, with a final summary or score indicating the likelihood of appendicitis being present. Aggregation of data over time through use of a common format could help guide radiologist recommendations based on which imaging findings are present. Overall, a standardized report could help increase the value of ultrasound, leading to improved radiologist-clinician communication, better patient outcomes, and decreased costs.

摘要

虽然计算机断层扫描(CT)仍然是阑尾炎成像最准确且应用最广泛的方式,但超声已发展出其自身的特定作用,尤其是在儿科人群和绝经前女性中。当有条件时,超声通常用作初始成像检查,不确定或临床可疑的病例则进行CT检查。为避免CT的辐射、时间和成本,超声需要改进。虽然先前的研究集中在通过更好的患者选择和技术来提高超声的诊断准确性,但超声报告相对较少受到关注,而超声报告往往是放射科医生和临床医生之间唯一的沟通方式。研究发现,报告和术语的标准化可改善乳腺成像中的患者治疗效果和管理。阑尾炎的标准化报告有可能减少混乱并提高准确性。一种可能的格式可以包括与阑尾炎相关的成像结果存在或不存在的标准化列表,最终总结或分数表明存在阑尾炎的可能性。通过使用通用格式随着时间推移汇总数据,有助于根据存在的成像结果指导放射科医生的建议。总体而言,标准化报告有助于提高超声的价值,从而改善放射科医生与临床医生之间的沟通、改善患者治疗效果并降低成本。

相似文献

1
Is there a need to standardize reporting terminology in appendicitis?
Ultrasound Q. 2015 Jun;31(2):92-4. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000123.
2
Update on appendicitis: diagnosis and presurgical management.
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006 Jun;18(3):234-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000193314.75827.27.
4
Implementing an ultrasound-based protocol for diagnosing appendicitis while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Apr;45(5):678-85. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3220-9. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
5
What is the complementary role of ultrasound evaluation in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis after CT?
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Apr;74(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.017. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
8
Improving ultrasound quality to reduce computed tomography use in pediatric appendicitis: the Safe and Sound campaign.
Am J Surg. 2015 May;209(5):896-900; discussion 900. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.029. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
10
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain--Suspected Appendicitis.
Ultrasound Q. 2015 Jun;31(2):85-91. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000118.

引用本文的文献

1
APENDIC-RADS: an ultrasound reporting system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 16;22:eAO1164. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO1164. eCollection 2024.
2
Diagnostic value of biochemical markers in prediction of perforation in acute appendicitis: a cross-sectional study.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 17;86(11):6495-6501. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002547. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Paediatric Acute Appendicitis: A Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Pre-operative Diagnostic Modalities.
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022 Jul-Sep;12(3):89-95. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_145_22. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Improving ultrasound for appendicitis through standardized reporting of secondary signs.
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Aug;52(8):1273-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.11.045. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
5
Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Mar;33(3):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3990-2. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis.
Adv Surg. 2013;47:299-328. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2013.03.003.
2
Sonography of the normal appendix: its varied appearance and techniques to improve its visualization.
Ultrasound Q. 2013 Dec;29(4):333-41. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3182a2aa8e.
3
Appendix not seen: the predictive value of secondary inflammatory sonographic signs.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Apr;29(4):435-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318289e8d5.
8
Medical imaging data reconciliation, part 4: Reconciliation of radiology reports and clinical outcomes data.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Dec;8(12):858-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.06.015.
9
Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample.
Am J Surg. 2011 Apr;201(4):433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验